Friday, June 21, 2013

TRIGGERING CLIMATE CHANGE

WASHINGTON'S NEW WORLD ORDER WEAPONS 
HAVE THE ABILITY TO TRIGGER CLIMATE CHANGE.

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky.

The important debate on global warming under UN auspices provides but a partial picture of climate change; in addition to the devastating impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the ozone layer, the World’s climate can now be modified as part of a new generation of sophisticated “non-lethal weapons.” Both the Americans and the Russians have developed capabilities to manipulate the World’s climate.

In the US, the technology is being perfected under the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) as part of the (“Star Wars”) Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI). Recent scientific evidence suggests that HAARP is fully operational and has the ability of potentially triggering floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes. From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction. Potentially, it constitutes an instrument of conquest capable of selectively destabilising agricultural and ecological systems of entire regions.

While there is no evidence that this deadly technology has been used, surely the United Nations should be addressing the issue of “environmental warfare” alongside the debate on the climatic impacts of greenhouse gases…

Despite a vast body of scientific knowledge, the issue of deliberate climatic manipulations for military use has never been explicitly part of the UN agenda on climate change. Neither the official delegations nor the environmental action groups participating in the Hague Conference on Climate Change (CO6) (November 2000) have raised the broad issue of “weather warfare” or “environmental modification techniques (ENMOD)” as relevant to an understanding of climate change.

The clash between official negotiators, environmentalists and American business lobbies has centered on Washington’s outright refusal to abide by commitments on carbon dioxide reduction targets under the 1997 Kyoto protocol.(1) The impacts of military technologies on the World’s climate are not an object of discussion or concern. Narrowly confined to greenhouse gases, the ongoing debate on climate change serves Washington’s strategic and defense objectives.

“WEATHER WARFARE”

World renowned scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell confirms that “US military scientists … are working on weather systems as a potential weapon. The methods include the enhancing of storms and the diverting of vapor rivers in the Earth’s atmosphere to produce targeted droughts or floods.” (2) Already in the 1970s, former National Security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski had foreseen in his book “Between Two Ages” that:

“Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised… [T]echniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm.”

Marc Filterman, a former French military officer, outlines several types of “unconventional weapons” using radio frequencies. He refers to “weather war,” indicating that the U.S. and the Soviet Union had already “mastered the know-how needed to unleash sudden climate changes (hurricanes, drought) in the early 1980s.”(3) These technologies make it “possible to trigger atmospheric disturbances by using Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) radar [waves].” (4)

A simulation study of future defense “scenarios” commissioned for the US Air Force calls for:

“US aerospace forces to ‘own the weather’ by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications… From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary… In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels.(5)

HIGH-FREQUENCY ACTIVE AURORAL RESEARCH PROGRAM (HAARP)

The High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) based in Gokoma Alaska –jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy– is part of a new generation of sophisticated weaponry under the US Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Operated by the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Space Vehicles Directorate, HAARP constitutes a system of powerful antennas capable of creating “controlled local modifications of the ionosphere”. Scientist Dr. Nicholas Begich –actively involved in the public campaign against HAARP– describes HAARP as:

“A super-powerful radiowave-beaming technology that lifts areas of the ionosphere [upper layer of the atmosphere] by focusing a beam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto earth and penetrate everything — living and dead.” (6)

Dr. Rosalie Bertell depicts HAARP as “a gigantic heater that can cause major disruption in the ionosphere, creating not just holes, but long incisions in the protective layer that keeps deadly radiation from bombarding the planet.” 7

MISLEADING PUBLIC OPINION

HAARP has been presented to public opinion as a program of scientific and academic research. US military documents seem to suggest, however, that HAARP’s main objective is to “exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes.” (8) Without explicitly referring to the HAARP program, a US Air Force study points to the use of “induced ionospheric modifications” as a means of altering weather patterns as well as disrupting enemy communications and radar.9

According to Dr. Rosalie Bertell, HAARP is part of a integrated weapons’ system, which has potentially devastating environmental consequences:

“It is related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly destructive programs to understand and control the upper atmosphere. It would be rash not to associate HAARP with the space laboratory construction which is separately being planned by the United States. HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature. The military implications of combining these projects is alarming. … The ability of the HAARP / Spacelab/ rocket combination to deliver very large amount of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening. The project is likely to be “sold” to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or, for the more gullible, a device for repairing the ozone layer. (10)

In addition to weather manipulation, HAARP has a number of related uses:

“HAARP could contribute to climate change by intensively bombarding the atmosphere with high-frequency rays… Returning low-frequency waves at high intensity could also affect people’s brains, and effects on tectonic movements cannot be ruled out. (11)

More generally, HAARP has the ability of modifying the World’s electro-magnetic field. It is part of an arsenal of “electronic weapons” which US military researchers consider a “gentler and kinder warfare”. (12)

WEAPONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER

HAARP is part of the weapons arsenal of the New World Order under the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). From military command points in the US, entire national economies could potentially be destabilized through climatic manipulations. More importantly, the latter can be implemented without the knowledge of the enemy, at minimal cost and without engaging military personnel and equipment as in a conventional war.

The use of HAARP — if it were to be applied — could have potentially devastating impacts on the World’s climate. Responding to US economic and strategic interests, it could be used to selectively modify climate in different parts of the World resulting in the destabilization of agricultural and ecological systems.

It is also worth noting that the US Department of Defense has allocated substantial resources to the development of intelligence and monitoring systems on weather changes. NASA and the Department of Defense’s National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) are working on “imagery for studies of flooding, erosion, land-slide hazards, earthquakes, ecological zones, weather forecasts, and climate change” with data relayed from satellites. (13)

POLICY INERTIA OF THE UNITED NATIONS

According to the Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) signed at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro:

“States have… in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the (…) responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction.” (14)

It is also worth recalling that an international Convention ratified by the UN General Assembly in 1997 bans “military or other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects.” (15) Both the US and the Soviet Union were signatories to the Convention. The Convention defines “‘environmental modification techniques’ as referring to any technique for changing–through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes–the dynamics, composition or structure of the earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere or of outer space.” (16)

Why then did the UN –disregarding the 1977 ENMOD Convention as well as its own charter– decide to exclude from its agenda climatic changes resulting from military programs?

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ACKNOWLEDGES IMPACTS OF HAARP

In February 1998, responding to a report of Mrs. Maj Britt Theorin –Swedish MEP and longtime peace advocate–, the European Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defense Policy held public hearings in Brussels on the HAARP program.(17) The Committee’s “Motion for Resolution” submitted to the European Parliament:

“Considers HAARP… by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body…; [the Committee] regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration… to give evidence to the public hearing …into the environmental and public risks [of] the HAARP program.” (18).

The Committee’s request to draw up a “Green Paper” on “the environmental impacts of military activities”, however, was casually dismissed on the grounds that the European Commission lacks the required jurisdiction to delve into “the links between environment and defense”. (19) Brussels was anxious to avoid a showdown with Washington.

FULLY OPERATIONAL

While there is no concrete evidence of HAARP having been used, scientific findings suggest that it is at present fully operational. What this means is that HAARP could potentially be applied by the US military to selectively modify the climate of an “unfriendly nation” or “rogue state” with a view to destabilizing its national economy.

Agricultural systems in both developed and developing countries are already in crisis as a result of New World Order policies including market deregulation, commodity dumping, etc. Amply documented, IMF and World Bank “economic medicine” imposed on the Third World and the countries of the former Soviet block has largely contributed to the destabilization of domestic agriculture. In turn, the provisions of the World Trade Organization (WTO) have supported the interests of a handful of Western agri-biotech conglomerates in their quest to impose genetically modified (GMO) seeds on farmers throughout the World.

It is important to understand the linkage between the economic, strategic and military processes of the New World Order. In the above context, climatic manipulations under the HAARP program (whether accidental or deliberate) would inevitably exacerbate these changes by weakening national economies, destroying infrastructure and potentially triggering the bankruptcy of farmers over vast areas. Surely national governments and the United Nations should address the possible consequences of HAARP and other “non-lethal weapons” on climate change.

NOTES

1. The latter calls for nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by an average of 5.2 percent to become effective between 2008 and 2012. See Background of Kyoto Protocol at http://www.globalwarming.net/gw11.html .

2. The Times, London, 23 November 2000.

3. Intelligence Newsletter, December 16, 1999.

4. Ibid.

5 Air University of the US Air Force, AF 2025 Final Report, http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/ (emphasis added).

6 Nicholas Begich and Jeane Manning, The Military’s Pandora’s Box, Earthpulse Press, http://www.xyz.net/~nohaarp/earthlight.html . See also the HAARP home page at http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/

7. See Briarpatch, January, 2000. (emphasis added).

8 Quoted in Begich and Manning, op cit.

9. Air University, op cit.

10. Rosalie Bertell, Background of the HAARP Program, 5 November, 1996,
http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/envronmt/weapons.htm

11. Begich and Manning, op cit.

12. Don Herskovitz, Killing Them Softly, Journal of Electronic Defense, August 1993. (emphasis added). According to Herskovitz, “electronic warfare” is defined by the US Department of Defense as “military action involving the use of electromagnetic energy…” The Journal of Electronic Defense at http://www.jedefense.com/ has published a range of articles on the application of electronic and electromagnetic military technologies.

13. Military Space, 6 December, 1999.

14. UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, New York, 1992. See complete text at
http://www.unfccc.de/resource/conv/conv_002.html , (emphasis added).

15. See Associated Press, 18 May 1977.

16. Environmental Modification Ban Faithfully Observed, States Parties Declare, UN Chronicle, July, 1984, Vol. 21, p. 27.

17. European Report, 7 February 1998.

18. European Parliament, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defense Policy, Brussels, doc. no. A4-0005/99, 14 January 1999.

19. EU Lacks Jurisdiction to Trace Links Between Environment and Defense, European Report, 3 February 1999.


Source.By Prof Michel Chossudovsky.17 June 2005.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/washington-s-new-world-order-weapons-have-the-ability-to-trigger-climate-change/205


===== RESOURCES FOR PROOF =======
Look Up! A Social Action Documentary.
-> http://youtu.be/jco2rKI_JAg

Look UP. Get the APP. Save the World
-> http://www.skyderalert.com/

Proof Of A Chemtrail Jet.
-> http://tinyurl.com/Proof-Of-A-Chemtrail-Jet

CONTRAIL vs CHEMTRAIL 101:
-> http://www.youtube.com/user/truthseeker1922

What in the World Are They Spraying? Documentary
-> http://youtu.be/jf0khstYDLA

What in the World Are They Spraying ? Home Page.
-> http://www.whatintheworldaretheyspraying.info/

What in the World Are They Spraying? Documentary
-> http://youtu.be/jf0khstYDLA

What in the World Are They Spraying ? Home Page.
-> http://www.whatintheworldaretheyspraying.info/

Why in the World are They Spraying?" Documentary
->http://youtu.be/mEfJO0-cTis

Chemtrails Through the Eyes of a Television Weatherman
-> http://youtu.be/_lj2OPPqj-o

US PATENT #5003186 - STRATOSPHERIC WELSBACH SEEDING FOR THE REDUCTION OF GLOBAL WARMING.Issued To Hughes Aircraft Company.
-> https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=547528211946590&set=a.544880092211402.1073741825.247681531931261&type=3&theater

OVER 150 US PATENTS RELATING TO CHEMTRAILS -> FROM 1920 TO 2003VIEW ALL PATENTS HERE
-> https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.544880092211402.1073741825.247681531931261&type=3

Case Orange -" A 300 Page Scientific Report on Chemtrails and weather manipulation by Dr. Vermeerenit.Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies.Web View or PDF.Web view.
-> https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=525868140779264&set=a.525822177450527.128127.247681531931261&type=3&theater
Or pdf view -> http://saive.com/911/DOCS/Chemtrail-Symposium-Belfort-Group-300Page-Report.pdf

Chemtrails - HAARP, Nicola Tesla's Scalar Energy Technology, Aerosols, Geoengineering, Global Warming, Weather Control, and Genetically Modified Foods Known as GMO's.We Are Going To Put All The Pieces Together And Tell You What They All Have To Do With President Ronald Reagan's "Star Wars" Speech from March 23, 1983.Our Review of the facts and The Complete Star Wars Text Transcript Is Included Below.
-> https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=523256294373782&set=a.523256277707117.127691.247681531931261&type=3&theater

Original CIA Unclassified Document NIC M 83-10017 From September 12 1983.Pay attention to the section called "Systems-10 Directed Energy". There are many pieces to the Chemtrail, HAARP and Scalar energy story.This Document is not only proof that Chemtrails are real but it proves Chemtrails are essential in the continued development of Scalar Energy that was originally invented by Nicola Tesla In the early 1900's.Document NIC M 83-10017 From September 12 1983
-> http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/offdocs/m8310017.htm

History Channel_ The Truth About Chemtrails And HAARP Technology
-> http://youtu.be/iKKdeeCwQ9E

Chemtrails-NWO-Illuminati:
-> http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAscendedConscious

The Illuminati Vol 1- 1 of 12
-> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0CJNA9OpZI&feature=share&list=PLD3A9A1A9F165D557

The World According to Monsanto [Full Length]
-> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87qrTXZaXkk

Like us to receive our live Chemtrail updates in your news feeds.
https://www.facebook.com/chemtrailresearch

 
░░░░░░░░░░░░░
Chemtrail Research▄▄
░░░ Like Us ░░█░░█
░░░░ On ░░░█░░█
░░ Facebook ░█░░░█
░░░░░░░░░█░░░░█
███████▄▄█░░░░░██████▄
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓█████░░░░░░░░░█
██████▀░░░░▀▀██████▀

*If You Have A Video,Picture,Link,Information Or Questions
We Would Love To Hear From You Any Time."Trolls" will be
kicked to the digital curb !

Aerosols, Acid Rain, Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR), Chemtrails, Chembows, Chemtrail Cirrus Clouds, Contrails, Cloud Seeding, Electromagnetic Weapons, Exotic Directed-Energy Weapons,Geoengineering, Global Warming Weather Modification, Scalar Energy, Scalar Weapons, Solar Radiation Management (SRM), Stationary Wave Cloud, Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering (SAG),Stratospheric Arial Spraying,Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols = (SAG or SRM), Sulfate Aerosol, Sulfate Aerosol Spray, Sulfate Particles, New Longitudinal EM Waves, Radiant Energy, Scalar Waves, Tesla Eaves, Vapor Trails, Wave Cloud, And Weather Modification.


☢ ☠ Wake Up And Look Up Chemtrails Are Real

Sunday, June 16, 2013

EARTH MASS EXTINCTION

EARTH in the midst of MASS EXTINCTION


Scientific Research explaining why they are spraying the sky's around the world. Learn and more importantly do something about the Chemtrails being sprayed. Learn the details here in this short film. UN Environment Program: 200 Species Extinct Every Day, Unlike Anything Since Dinosaurs Disappeared 65 Million Years Ago. According to the UN Environment Program, the Earth is in the midst of a mass extinction of life.

Scientists estimate that 150-200 species of plant, insect, bird and mammal become extinct every 24 hours. This is nearly 1,000 times the "natural" or "background" rate and, say many biologists, is greater than anything the world has experienced since the vanishing of the dinosaurs nearly 65m years ago.

Many people (dis-informed people) were saying they don't seed or spray the sky's, and well... all I have to do is look up or look at the documents I have to show these are plain ignorant to facts and data. Maybe they are in denial.

"The Images in this video show jets airliners and equipment used for jets airliners. No implied meaning other than "airliner" equipment is intended. For example: the tanks shown in this video represent "water" tanks and may or may not contain any other known chemical other than water. Any images shown in this video are part of the public domain available on the world wide web, and constitute no other rights implied or suggested. This video is for intended for learning purposes and may contain facts unaware to the general public.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoengin...

The concept of geoengineering has two meanings: The science of measuring and modelling the earth for applications within civil engineering, climate engineering, climate remediation, and climate intervention.

Geoengineering is commonly taken to mean the deliberate large-scale manipulation of the planetary environment to counteract anthropogenic climate change.

Geoengineering is distinct from large-scale environmental damage and accidental anthropogenic climate change, which are side-effects of human activity, rather than an intended consequence. Definitions of the term are not universally accepted. The global extraction of hydrocarbons from the sub-surface using integrated geoscience and engineering technology has been termed 'petroleum geoengineering' as an activity with global impact. The Oxford English Dictionary defines geoengineering as "the deliberate large-scale manipulation of an environmental process that affects the earth's climate, in an attempt to counteract the effects of global warming."

Side effects

The techniques themselves may cause significant foreseen or unforeseen harm. For example, the use of reflective balloons may result in significant litter, which may be harmful to wildlife.

Ozone depletion is a risk of some geoengineering techniques, notably those involving sulfur delivery into the stratosphere.

The active nature of geoengineering may in some cases create a clear division between winners and losers. Most of the proposed interventions are regional, such as albedo modification in the Arctic.

There may be unintended climatic consequences, such as changes to the hydrological cycle including droughts or floods, caused by the geoengineering techniques, but possibly not predicted by the models used to plan them. Such effects may be cumulative or chaotic in nature, making prediction and control very difficult.


WHAT CAN YOU DO?  To start, educate yourselves ASAP

http://geoengineeringwatch.org & http://globalskywatch.com

LEARN HOW TO PROTECT YOUR HEALTH TO REDUCE THE IMPACT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES 

LEGAL RAMIFICATION

DOE Openness:  Human  Experiments

ACHRE Report

 Part I: Overview

When the Advisory Committee began work in April 1994 we were charged with determining whether "the [radiation] experiments' design and administration adequately met the ethical and scientific standards, including standards of informed consent, that prevailed at the time of the experiments and that exist today" and also to "determine the ethical and scientific standards and criteria by which it shall evaluate human radiation experiments."

Although this charge seems straightforward, it is in fact difficult to determine what the appropriate standards should be for evaluating the conduct and policies of thirty or fifty years ago. First, we needed to determine the extent to which the standards of that time are similar to the standards of today. To the extent that there were differences we needed to determine the relative roles of each in making moral evaluations. 

In chapter 1 we report what we have been able to reconstruct about government rules and policies in the 1940s and 1950s regarding human experiments. We focus primarily on the Atomic Energy Commission and the Department of Defense, because their history with respect to human subjects research policy is less well known than that of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (now the Department of Health and Human Services). Drawing on records that were previously obscure, or only recently declassified, we reveal the perhaps surprising finding that officials and experts in the highest reaches of the AEC and DOD discussed requirements for human experiments in the first years of the Cold War. We also briefly discuss the research policies of DHEW and the Veterans Administration during these years. 

In chapter 2 we turn from a consideration of government standards to an exploration of the norms and practices of physicians and medical scientists who conducted research with human subjects during this period. We include here an analysis of the significance of the Nuremberg Code, which arose out of the international war crimes trial of German physicians in 1947. Using the results of our Ethics Oral History Project, and other sources, we also examine how scientists of the time viewed their moral responsibilities to human subjects as well as how this translated into the manner in which they conducted their research. Of particular interest are the differences in professional norms and practices between research in which patients are used as subjects and research involving so-called healthy volunteers.

In chapter 3 we return to the question of government standards, focusing now on the 1960s and 1970s. In the first part of this chapter, we review the well-documented developments that influenced and led up to two landmark events in the history of government policy on research involving human subjects: the promulgation by DHEW of comprehensive regulations for oversight of human subjects research and passage by Congress of the National Research Act. In the latter part of the chapter we review developments and policies governing human research in agencies other than DHEW, a history that has received comparatively little scholarly attention. We also discuss scandals in human research conducted by the DOD and the CIA that came to light in the 1970s and that influenced subsequent agency policies. 

With the historical context established in chapters 1 through 3, we turn in chapter 4 to the core of our charge. Here we put forward and defend three kinds of ethical standards for evaluating human radiation experiments conducted from 1944 to 1974. We embed these standards in a moral framework intended to clarify and facilitate the difficult task of making judgments about the past.

Chapter 3: Footnotes

1 . For a discussion of the development of the Common Rule, see chapter 14. 2 . We relied particularly on Ruth R. Faden and Tom L. Beauchamp, A History and Theory of Informed Consent (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986). Other excellent sources include Jay Katz, Experimentation with Human Beings (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1972), and Robert Levine, Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research (Baltimore: Urban and Schwarzenberg, 1981).
3 . U.S. Congress, The Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, Foreign and Military Intelligence [Church Committee report], report no. 94-755, 94th Cong., 2d Sess. (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1976). Also, U.S. Army Inspector General, Use of Volunteers in Chemical Agent Research [Army IG report] (Washington, D.C.: 1975).
4 . In dissenting opinions, four justices of the U.S. Supreme Court (Brennan, Marshall, Stevens, and O'Connor) cited the Nuremberg Code. United States et al. v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669, 687, 710 (1987).
5 . Thalidomide was only available in clinical trials in the United States at that time, but was approved for use in a number of other countries.
6 . Louis Lasagna, interview by Susan White-Junod and Jon Harkness (ACHRE), transcript of audio recording, 13 December 1994 (ACHRE Research Project Series, Interview Program Files, Ethics Oral History Project), 37-38. See also, Louis Lasagna, "1938-1968: The FDA, the Drug Industry, the Medical Profession, and the Public," in Safeguarding the Public: Historical Aspects of Medicinal Drug Control, ed. John B. Blake (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1970), 173.
7 . Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act amendments, 21 U.S.C. [[section]] 355 (1962).
8 . Congressional Record, 87th Cong, 2d Sess., 22042, as cited in an attached memorandum, C. Joseph Stetler, Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, to James L. Goddard, M.D., Commissioner of Food and Drugs, DHEW, 11 October 1966 ("Regarding Statement Appearing in August 30, 1966 Federal Register Concerning Clinical Investigation of Drugs") (ACHRE No. HHS-090794-A).
9 . Keith Reemtsma et al., "Reversal of Early Graft Rejection after Renal Heterotransplantation in Man," Journal of the American Medical Association 187 (1964): 691-696.
10 . This research, conducted by Dr. Chester Southam of Sloan-Kettering Institute and Dr. Emmanuel Mandel of the Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital in 1963 and funded by the U.S. Public Health Service and the American Cancer Society, raised concern within PHS and brought about an investigation by the hospital. Drs. Mandel and Southam were subject to a disciplinary hearing before the Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York. The hospital's internal review and a suit against the hospital prompted concern and debate at the NIH. Edward J. Rourke, Assistant General Counsel, NIH, to Dr. Luther L. Terry, Surgeon General, 16 September 1965 ("Research Grants--Clinical--PHS responsibility--Fink v. Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital [New York Supreme Court, Kings County]") (ACHRE No. HHS-090794-A).
For a more thorough discussion of this case, see Katz, Experimentation with Human Beings, 9-65.
11 . In 1967 Dr. Southam was elected vice president of the American Association for Cancer Research and became president the following year. Katz, Experimentation with Human Beings, 63 and 65.
12 . For a fuller discussion of the Law-Medicine Research Institute, see chapter 2.
13 . The development of the Declaration of Helsinki is discussed briefly in chapter 2.
14 . Robert B. Livingston, Associate Chief for Program Development, Memorandum to the Director, NIH, 4 November 1964 ("Progress Report on Survey of Moral and Ethical Aspects of Clinical Investigation" [the Livingston report]) (ACHRE No. HHS-090795-A), 3.
15 . Ibid., 7.
16 . Ibid.
17 . Mark S. Frankel, "Public Policymaking for Biomedical Research: The Case of Human Experimentation" (Ph.D. diss., George Washington University, 9 May 1976), 50-51.
18 . The NAHC discussed the "general question of the ethical, moral, and legal aspects of clinical investigation" at its meetings of September and December 1965. Terry's interest in this was motivated in part by the concern of Senator Jacob K. Javits that the informed consent provisions of the 1962 Drug Amendments were not applicable to nondrug-related research. See (a) draft letter to Senator Javits from the Surgeon General, 15 October 1965; (b) Senator Javits to Luther L. Terry, Surgeon General, 15 June 1965; and (c) Edward J. Rourke, Assistant General Counsel, to William H. Stewart, Surgeon General, 26 October 1965. All in ACHRE No. HHS-090794-A.
19 . Transcript of the NAHC meeting, Washington, D.C., 28 September 1965. See Faden and Beauchamp, A History and Theory of Informed Consent, 208.
20 . Ibid.
21 . Dr. S. John Reisman, the Executive Secretary, NAHC, to Dr. James A. Shannon, 6 December 1965 ("Resolution of Council") (ACHRE No. HHS-090794-A).
22 . Surgeon General, Public Health Service to the Heads of the Institutions Conducting Research with Public Health Service Grants, 8 February 1966 ("Clinical research and investigation involving human beings") (ACHRE No. HHS-090794-A). This policy was distributed through Bureau of Medical Services Circular no. 38, 23 June 1966 ("Clinical Investigations Using Human Beings As Subjects") (ACHRE No. HHS-090794-A).
23 . In December 1966 the policy was expanded to include behavioral as well as medical research. William H. Stewart, Surgeon General, Public Health Service, to Heads of Institutions Receiving Public Health Service Grants, 12 December 1966 ("Clarification of procedure on clinical research and investigation involving human subjects") (ACHRE No. HHS-072894-B), 2.
In 1967 the Public Health Service required that intramural research, including that conducted at NIH, abide by similar requirements. William H. Stewart, Surgeon General of the Public Health Service, to List, 30 October 1967 ("PHS policy for intramural programs and for contracts when investigations involving human subjects are included") (ACHRE No. HHS-072894-B), 2.
24 . Frankel, "Public Policymaking for Biomedical Research: The Case of Human Experimentation," 161.
25 . Ibid., 161-162.
26 . U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, The Institutional Guide to DHEW Policy on Protection of Human Subjects (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1971) (ACHRE No. HHS-090794-A).
27 . Ibid., 1-2.
28 . Beecher's criticism involved many aspects of the research, including the risk assessment, usefulness of the research, and the question of informed consent. On this last point, Beecher argued that while consent was important, he disputed the belief that it was easily obtainable. In his talk at Brook Lodge, Beecher questioned the "naive assumption implicit in the Nuremberg Code," that consent was readily obtainable. Beecher indicated the difficulty of obtaining truly informed consent may have led many researchers to treat the provision cavalierly and often to ignore it. Henry K. Beecher, "Ethics and the Explosion of Human Experimentation," unpublished manuscript of paper presented 22 March 1965, "a," Beecher Papers, Countway Library (ACHRE No. IND-072595-A).
29 . Ibid.,"a" and "b."
30 . Ibid., 2a.
31 . Ibid., 2.
32 . H. K. Beecher, "Ethics and Clinical Research," New England Journal of Medicine 274 (1966): 1354-1360.
33 . W. Goodman, "Doctors Must Experiment on Humans--But What are Patients Rights?" New York Times Magazine, 2 July 1965, 12-13, 29-33, as cited in Faden and Beauchamp, A History and Theory of Informed Consent, 188.
34 . J. Lear, "Do We Need New Rules for Experimentation on People?" Saturday Review, 5 February 1966, 61-70.
35 . Henry K. Beecher, "Consent in Clinical Experimentation: Myth and Reality," Journal of the American Medical Association 195 (1966): 34-35.
36 . J. Lear, "Experiments on People--The Growing Debate," Saturday Review, 2 July 1966, 41-43.
37 . Both the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal ran stories on 24 March 1971. See Medical World News, 15 October 1971, "Was Dr. Krugman Justified in Giving Children Hepatitis?"
38 . Beecher, Research and the Individual: Human Studies (Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1970), 122-127.
39 . Paul Ramsey, The Patient as Person: Explorations in Medical Ethics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970), 51-55.
40 . In a letter to the Lancet, Dr. Stephen Goldby called the work "unjustifiable" and asked, "Is it right to perform an experiment on a normal or mentally retarded child when no benefit can result to the individual?" (S. Goldby, "Letters to the Editor," Lancet 7702 [1971]: 749). The Lancet editors agreed with Goldby. On this side of the Atlantic, however, the editors of NEJM and JAMA, among others, defended Krugman's work.
41 . Armed Forces Epidemiological Board, minutes of 24 May 1957 (ACHRE No. NARA-032495-B).
42 . S. Krugman, "Ethical Practices in Human Experimentation," text of lecture presented at the Fifth Annual Midwest Student Medical Research Forum, 1 March 1974 (ACHRE No. IND-072895-A).
43 . Ibid., 3-4.
44 . Louis Goldman, "The Willowbrook Debate," World Medicine (September 1971 and November 1971): 23, 25.
45 . James H. Jones, Bad Blood (New York: Free Press, 1993 edition), 114.
46 . Jones, Bad Blood (1981), 69-71; Levine, Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research, 70.
47 . Charles J. McDonald, "The Contribution of the Tuskegee Study to Medical Knowledge," Journal of the National Medical Association (January 1974): 1-11, as cited in Faden and Beauchamp, A History and Theory of Informed Consent, 194-195.
48 . Jean Heller, "Syphilis Victims in U.S. Study Went Untreated for 40 Years," New York Times (26 July 1972) 1, 8, as cited in Faden and Beauchamp, A History and Theory of Informed Consent, 195.
49 . U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Final Report of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study Ad Hoc Panel (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1973), Jay Katz Concurring Opinion, 14.
50 . Ibid.
51 . Ibid., 21-32.
52 . Ibid., 23.
53 . Senator Jacob Javits introduced legislation that would have made the DHEW policy a regulation backed by federal law. S. 878 and S. 974, 93d Cong., 1st Sess. (1973).
Senator Hubert Humphrey introduced a bill to create a National Human Experimentation Standards Board--a separate federal agency with authority over research similar to the Security and Exchange Commission's authority over securities transactions. S. 934, 93d Cong., 1st Sess. (1973).
Also, Senator Walter Mondale introduced a resolution to provide for a "study and evaluation of the ethical, social, and legal" aspects of biomedical research. S.J. Res. 71, 93d Cong., 1st Sess. (1973).
54 . It is worth noting here that Senator Kennedy had convened similar hearings two years previously, in 1971, to consider the establishment of a national commission to examine "ethical, social, and legal implications of advances in biomedical research." Among the topics mentioned in this hearing was the total-body irradiation research sponsored by the Department of Defense at the University of Cincinnati, which we discuss in chapter 8.
55 . Jay Katz, "Human Experimentation: A Personal Odyssey," IRB 9, no. 1 (January/February 1987): 1-6.
56 . Protection of Human Subjects, 39 Fed. Reg. 105, 18914-18920 (1974) (to be codified at 45 C.F.R. [[section]] 46).
57 . National Research Act of 1974. P.L. 348, 93d Cong., 2d Sess. (12 July 1974).
58 . U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office for Protection from Research Risks, 18 April 1979, OPPR Reports [The Belmont Report] (ACHRE No. HHS-011795-A-2), 4-20.
59 . Interestingly, this committee included Henry Beecher, who, as was discussed in part I, chapter 3, had objected to the imposition of these requirements to contract research in 1961. Beecher's presence on the committee testifies to the common relationship between military and private research during this time. Like many of the
60 . Department of the Army, Army Regulation 40-37, 12 August 1963 ("Radioisotope License Program [Human Use]").
61 . Department of the Army, AR 40-38, 23 February 1973 ("Medical Services--Clinical Investigation Program").
62 . Ibid.
63 . Ibid.
64 . Commanding Officer, Naval Medical Research Institute, National Naval Medical Center, to Secretary of the Navy, 30 November 1964 ("Authorization to use human volunteers as subjects for study of effects of hypoxia on the visual field; request for") (ACHRE No. DOD-091494-A), 2.
65 . Department of the Navy, "Manual of the Medical Department," 20-8, Change 36, 7 March 1967 ("Use of Volunteers in Medical or Other Hazardous Experiments") (ACHRE No. DOD-091494-A).
66 . Department of the Navy, SecNav Instruction 3900.39, 28 April 1969 ("Use of volunteers as subjects of research, development, tests, and evaluation").
67 . Department of the Air Force, AFR 169-8, 8 October 1965 ("Medical Education and Research--Use of Volunteers in Aerospace Research").
68 . Ibid.
69 . Ibid.
70 . National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Manned Spacecraft Center, MSCI 1860.2, 12 May 1966 ("Establishment of MSC Radiological Control Manual and Radiological Control Committee") (ACHRE No. NASA-022895-A), 3.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, "Ames Management Manual 7170-1," 15 January 1968 ("Human Research Planning and Approval") (ACHRE No. NASA-120894-A), 3.
71 . Ames required the voluntary, written informed consent of the subject and stipulated that consent be informed by an
explanation to the subject in language understandable to him . . . [including] the nature, duration, and purpose of the human research; the manner in which it will be conducted; and all foreseeable risks, inconveniences and discomforts.
"Ames Management Manual 7170-1," 15 January 1968, 3.
72 . The Ames director was authorized to waive the consent requirements (a) when the requirements would "not be necessary to protect the subject"; (b) when the research uses "classes of trained persons who knowingly follow a specialized calling or occupation which is generally recognized as hazardous," including "test pilots and astronauts"; and (c) when the research "would be seriously hampered" by compliance. "Ames Management Manual 7170-1," 15 January 1968, 3.
73 . For example, one review from this group recommended changes in a consent form to include
[T]he part of the procedure you are consenting to which principally benefits the research program and is not part of your treatment is known as arterial puncture. . . . These risks will be explained to you in detail if you so desire. The entire procedure, including the diagnostic radioscan, takes about an hour.
Although this proposed consent form does not delineate the medical risks posed by the procedure, its statement that the patient's participation is incidental to treatment may provide a greater opportunity for the patient to make an informed decision about participation. George A. Rathert, Jr., Chairman, Human Research Experiments Review Board, ARC, to Director, 20 January 1969 ("Proposed Investigation entitled 'Measurement of Cerebral Blood Flow in Man by an Isotopic Technique Employing External Counting,' by Dr. Leo Sapierstein, Stanford University") (ACHRE No. NASA-022895-A), 4.
At MSC, the instruction establishing the Medical Uses Subcommittee was rescinded in 1968. In 1969, formal combination of the medical operations and medical research functions at MSC led to the reestablishment of the instruction as the Medical Isotopes Subcommittee at MSC. No evidence suggests what factors, other than risk, were considered in this form of prior review is available currently. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Manned Spacecraft Center, MSCI 1860.2, 12 May 1966 ("Establishment of MSC Radiological Control Manual and Radiological Control Committee"); and National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NMI 1156.19, 28 August 1969 ("Medical Isotopes Subcommittee of the MSC Radiation Safety Committee") (ACHRE No. NASA-022895-A).
74 . National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NMI 71008.9, 2 February 1972 ("Human Research Policy and Procedures") (ACHRE No. NASA-022895-A). See also, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NMI 7100.9 ("Power and Authority -- To Authorize Human Research and to Grant Certain Related Exceptions and Waivers") (ACHRE No. NASA-022895-A).
75 . Commission on CIA Activities within the United States, Report to the President, (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1975).
76 . U.S. Congress, The Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, Foreign and Military Intelligence [Church Committee report], report no. 94-755, 94th Cong., 2d Sess. (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1976), 394.
77 . For general information on the CIA program, see the Church Committee report, 385-422, and J. Marks, The Search for the "Manchurian Candidate": The CIA and Mind Control (New York: Times Books, 1978).
78 . Church Committee report, book 1, 389.
79 . Church Committee report, book 1, 400, 402. In 1963 the CIA inspector general (IG) recommended that unwitting testing be terminated, but Deputy Director for Plans Richard Helms (who later became director of Central Intelligence) continued to advocate covert testing on the ground that "positive operational capability to use drugs is diminishing, owing to a lack of realistic testing. With increasing knowledge of the state of the art, we are less capable of staying up with the Soviet advances in this field." The Church Committee noted that "Helms attributed the cessation of the unwitting testing to the high risk of embarrassment to the Agency as well as the 'moral problem.' He noted that no better covert situation had been devised than that which had been used, and that
80 . Ibid., 402.
81 . Executive Order 11905 (19 February 1976).
82 . Executive Order 12036, section 2-301 (26 January 1978) and Executive Order 12333, section 2.10 (4 December 1981).
83 . U.S. Army Inspector General, Use of Volunteers in Chemical Agent Research [Army IG report] (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1975), 2.
84 . One noted exception involved using LSD as an interrogation devise on ten foreign intelligence agents, and one U.S. citizen suspected of stealing classified documents. Army IG report, 143.
85 . Army IG report, 87.
86 . Ibid.
87 . The CIA paid death benefits to the Olson family after Frank Olson's death, and the Army secretly paid half of an $18,000 settlement that the Blauer family negotiated with the state of New York in 1955. The state ran the psychiatric institute that administered the drugs, but which never disclosed the Army's involvement. Both agencies feared that the resulting embarrassment and adverse publicity might undermine their ability to continue their secret research programs. Barrett v. United States, 6660 F. Supp. 1291 (E. D. N.Y., 1987).
88 . Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 146 (1950).
89 . United States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669 (1987).
90 . 483 U.S. 669, 682.
91 . 483 U.S. 669, 687-88.
92 . 483 U.S. 669, 709-10.
93 . George Annas, a scholar of human experimentation and biomedical ethics, has traced the history of the Nuremberg Code in the U.S. courts. The first express reference in a majority opinion, Annas found, was in a 1973 decision in the Circuit Court in Wayne County, Michigan. The decisions in which the Code has since been cited, Annas concluded, reflect the proposition that the Nuremberg Code is a "document fundamentally about nontherapeutic experimentation." Thus, the "types of experiments that U.S. judges have found the Nuremberg Code useful for setting standards have involved nontherapeutic experiments often conducted without consent. . . . Many of these experiments were justified by national security considerations and the cold war." George J. Annas, "The Nuremberg Code in U.S. Courts: Ethics versus Expediency," in George J. Annas and Michael A. Grodin, eds., The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), 218.

Source:  www.hss.doe.gov
http://www.hss.doe.gov/healthsafety/ohre/roadmap/achre/chap3_fn.html#fn80


Sunday, May 12, 2013

URGENT MESSAGE

URGENT
Reaching Suffocation Level
World Wide Notice! 
Dane Wigington May 7, 2013


The human body can sustain life over a period of days and weeks with out food. The body can sustain life for days without water. The body CAN NOT sustain life over a few minutes without oxygen. Following is a list taken from the Johnston County Emergency Services that explains the results of lack of oxygen at the differnt levels.

It is important to realize:


You may already be suffering the effects from lack of oxygen.

These effects include:


at 21% Oxygen Level


Normal Atmospheric Level

at 19.5% Oxygen Level


Minimum Healthful Level

at 15 - 19% Oxygen Level

Decreased Stamina and Coordination, may induce early symptoms described below

at 12 - 14% Oxygen Level

Breathing rate increases with exertion, increase in heart rate.  Impaired coordination, perception, and judgment.

at 10 - 12% Oxygen Level

Breathing further increases in rate and depth, lips turn blue.  Poor judgment.

at 8 - 10% Oxygen Level

Mental failure, fainting, unconsciousness, nausea, and vomiting.

at 6 - 8% Oxygen Level

Fatal after 6 -8 minutes.

at 4 - 6% Oxygen Level

Coma in 40 seconds, convulsions, respiration ceases, and death.


Source: http://www.johnstonnc.com/mainpage.cfm?category_level_id=642&content_id=792

Until there is a moratorium or total ban placed on the  geoengineering testing of our atmosphere it is highly recommended to learn how the body can make the best use of the available oxygen that is left in our atmosphere.

The cells in our body are dependent on oxygen.  It is not only our repiratory system that is suffocating but the cells in the body to which the oxygen supply is intended.

It has been proven through science and the medical community that all cells in the body contain mitachondri that are dependent on sufficient oxygen to carry on their work and to sustain their life as well as yours.  The cause of cancer is now known to be a lack of oxygen to the mitachodri in the cells.   http://www.advancedhealthplan.com/page3.html

It is my intention here to give just a quick summary of some simple things we can do to help insure we are able to make the best use of what oxygen we do have available.

Keep your pH up.  An alkaline environment provides for more available oxygen in the body.  The body maintains the pH of the blood at 7.35 but if there is insufficient supply in the body the body will become acidic due to the need for the blood to maintain that 7.35.   When our body becomes more acidic we find that our immune system becomes compromised and opens up to an entire host of various ailments.

The best way to begin this is to stay away from all sugar (carbohydrates), white flour, processed foods, additives, toxins (msg, aspartame) and other acid producing foods and processes (microwaves).  Here is a list to help manage the food you are supplying to the cells.
http://www.advancedhealthplan.com/foods.html

Here also is a great video done by Dr. Lustig that helps explain the many problems we face due to the consumption of sugar:  http://youtu.be/dBnniua6-oM

Supplemention of vitamins and minerals are a fairly standard way to assure your body is getting what it was intended to have.  The food supply is becoming more void of nutrients, vitamins and minerals for several reasons that we shall not go into here, but it is safe to say that it is time to pay attention to the foods we are supplying to maintain and recover our health.

A good combination, ratio and form of calcium, potassium and magnesium are essential in raising our pH which also then provides more available oxygen to the internal environment.

A good form of what many call Vitamin C is essential.  (buffered mineral ascorbate is the form most like what the body produced when it was still able to produce its own.  The body can no longer do that.)  The RDA is NOT a sufficient supply for what the human body needs. Dr. Linus Pauling suggested 3 to 10 grams a day for an average size person of 150 lbs.  His work has been confirmed now by many others.  Great area of research.

Ascorbate (vitamin C) is valuable for many functions in the body.  Ascorbate repairs cellular damage, rebuilds the collagen matrix and helps to remove toxins from the body.  Among many other things it s also the oxygen transport system.

L-arginine and B3 (niacin) will helps improve circulation and thus a greater volume of blood flow which helps in moving more oxygen to each part of the body.

The correct essential oil is a must.  I use organic cold pressed organic hemp oil as this is an oil that is in a perfect ratio of Omega 3 and Omega 6.  Just one tablespoon of hemp oil a day will reach each one of the trillions of cells in the body.  The oil works as an oxygen transfer system as the oil reaches the cells it can be easily transferred through the cellular wall to the mitachondri.

Get plenty of good free Vitamin D every chance you get.  I know clear skies are hard to find in many places around the world, but the sun serves a vital function for synthesis of other nutrients, minerals and metabolytes.  If this is not available to you, the best form of vitamin D supplement is vitamin D3.

NOTE: Over the last 11 years of researching, the following protocols provide what my body needs and prevents my body from becoming sick from this toxic environment we live in.  These protocols are in the best form, the correct ratio and contain an ample supply of what the body was intended to have when it was created.  They are all natural, effective, safe and inexpensive.
I use the Best Buy link.

There is also a growing concern of the amount of other particulates contained in the aerosols that are being sprayed throughout the atmosphere.  The formulas above also contain malic acid and silica that are known to assist in the removal of plaque buildup from the aluminum and fluoride.  This is especially important as we see the numbers being diagnosed with ADD, ADHD, Autism and Alzheimer's continue to grow.


PATENTS- GEOENGINEERING


WHY IS THE USA AIR FORCE REMOVING THIS IMAGE FROM THE INTERNET ?


START BY READING THE PATENTS LISTED IN THE PHOTO ..THIS IS WHERE THE FACTS ARE HIDDEN -> PLUS VIEW OVER 150 ORIGINAL US PATENTS BELOW IN FULL ALL RELATING TO SRM SAG HAARP GEOENGINEERING AND OR THE WEAPONIZATION OF THE ATMOSPHERE VIA CHEMTRAILS.

From what we can tell this photo first appeared on the internet in 1999 and the USA's department of Defense has been busy every sense trying to remove this image from every corner of the internet, but why ? We don't know.

The photo clearly shows some kind of man made chemical trails are being made here.A now dead NASA link claimed that this "C130 Formation" photo was taken during tests on vortices they were doing behind aircrafts.Let me remind you that NASA is not a public agency, it is a division of the USA department of national defense so you should never expect the truth or transparency. Just like a 3 year old child,..denial denial and denial is the the official moto from all of the USA department of defense agency's.This is the same group that brought us Agent Orange in the seventies and the name alone still stokes fear in Vietnam's pregnant women.

You should use some discernment with the information presented here.We do not know what the story is around this image but it sure has been creating a stir on the internet for over 14 years,so you can be rest assured this image will bring in the CIA Trolls..Stay posted this is sure to be hot topic!

☢ ================= ✈

VIEW OVER 150 ORIGINAL US PATENTS
RELATING TO SRM SAG HAARP AND CHEMTRAIL GEOENGINEERING AND OR THE WEAPONIZATION OF THE ATMOSPHERE VIA CHEMTRAILS.A CHRONICALLY ORDER OF RELATED US PATENTS BELOW.All Patents Are Viewable Here
-> http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html


1891 - 0462795 – method of producing rain-fall
1914 - 1103490 – rain maker (balloon images)
1917 - 1225521 – protection from poisonous gas in warfare
1920 - 1338343 – process and apparatus for the production of intense artificial clouds, fogs, or mists
1924 - 1512783 – composition for dispelling fogs
1927 - 1619183 – process of producing smoke clouds from moving aircraft
1928 - 1665267 – process of producting artificial fogs
1932 - 1892132 – atomizing attachment for airplane engine exhausts
1933 - 1928963 – electrical system and method (for spraying chemtrails)
1934 - 1957075 – airplane spray equipment
1936 - 2045865 – skywriting apparatus
1936 - 2052626 – method of dispelling fog (mit)
1937 - 2068987 – process of dissipating fog
1939 - 2160900 – method for vapor clearing
1941 - 2232728 – method and composition for dispelling vapors
1941 - 2257360 – desensitized pentaerythritol tetranitrate explosive
1946 - 2395827 – airplane spray unit (us. dept. of agriculture)
1946 - 2409201 – smoke-producing mixture
1949 - 2476171 – smoke screen generator
1949 - 2480967 – aerial discharge device
1950 - 2527230 – method of crystal formation and precipitation
1951 - 2550324 – process for controlling weather
1951 - 2570867 – method of crystal formation and precipitation (general electric)
1952 - 2582678 – material disseminating apparatus for airplanes
1952 - 2591988 – production of tio2 pigments (dupont)
1952 - 2614083 – metal chloride screening smoke mixture
1953 - 2633455 – smoke generator
1954 - 2688069 – steam generator
1955 - 2721495 – method and apparatus for detecting minute crystal forming particles suspended in a gaseous atmosphere (general electric)
1956 - 2730402 – controllable dispersal device
1957 - 2801322 – decomposition chamber for monopropellant fuel
1958 - 2835530 – process for the condensation of atmospheric humidity and dissolution of fog
1959 - 2881335 – generation of electrical fields (haarp – for re-charging clouds!)
1959 - 2903188 – control of tropical cyclone formation
1959 - 2908442 – method for dispersing natural atmospheric fogs and clouds
1960 - 2962450 – fog dispelling composition (see references)
1960 - 2963975 – cloud seeding carbon dioxide bullet
1961 - 2986360 – aerial insecticide dusting device
1962 - 3044911 – propellant system
1962 - 3056556 – method of artificially influencing the weather
1964 - 3120459 – composite incendiary powder containing metal coated oxidizing salts
1964 - 3126155 – silver iodide cloud seeding generator (main commercial ingrediant)
1964 - 3127107 – generation of ice-nucleating crystals
1964 - 3131131 – electrostatic mixing in microbial conversions
1965 - 3174150 – self-focusing antenna system (haarp)
1966 - 3257801 – pyrotechnic composition comprising solid oxidizer, boron and aluminum additive and binder
1966 - 3234357 – electrically heated smoke producing device
1966 - 3274035 – metallic composition for production of hydroscopic smoke
1967 - 3300721 – means for communication through a layer of ionized gases (haarp)
1967 - 3313487 – cloud seeding apparatus
1967 - 3338476 – heating device for use with aerosol containers
1968 - 3410489 – automatically adjustable airfoil spray system with pump
1969 - 3429507 – rainmaker
1969 - 3430533 – aircraft dispensor pod having self-sealing ejection tubes
1969 - 3432208 – fluidized particle dispenser (us air force)
1969 - 3437502 – titanium dioxide pigment coated with silica and aluminum (dupont)
1969 - 3441214 – method and apparatus for seeding clouds
1969 - 3445844 – trapped electromagnetic radiation communications system (haarp – raytheon)
1969 - 3456880 – method of producing precipitation from the atmosphere
1970 - 3517512 – apparatus for suppressing contrails
1970 - 3518670 – artificial ion cloud
1970 - 3531310 – production of improved metal oxide pigment
1970 - 3534906 – control of atmospheric particles (dow chemical co)
1970 - 3545677 – method of cloud seeding
1971 - 3564253 – system and method for irradiation of planet surface areas (space solar mirrors)
1971 - 3587966 – freezing nucleation
1971 - 3601312 – methods of increasing the likelihood of precipatation by the artificial introduction of sea water vapor into the atmosphere winward of an air lift region
1971 - 3608810 – methods of treating atmospheric conditions
1971 - 3608820 – treatment of atmospheric conditions by intermittent dispensing of materials therein
1971 - 3613992 – weather modification method
1971 - 3630950 – combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process
1972 - 3647710 – method for dispersing fog with phosphate salt compositions
1972 - 3653383 – algin sponge and process therefor
1972 - 3659785 – weather modification utilizing microencapsulated material (gross)
1972 - 3666176 – solar temperature inversion device
1972 - 3677840 – pyrotechnics comprising oxide of silver for weather modification use
1972 - 3690552 – fog dispersal
1973 - 3722183 – device for clearing impurities from the atmosphere
1973 - 3769107 – pyrotechnic composition for generating lead based smoke (are you serious?)
1974 - 3784099 – air pollution control method
1974 - 3785557 – cloud seeding system
1974 - 3795626 – weather modification process
1974 - 3808595 – chaff dispensing system
1974 - 3813875 – rocket having barium release system to create ion clouds in the upper atmopsphere (nasa)
1974 - 3835059 – methods of generating ice nuclei smoke particles for weather modification and apparatus therefore
1974 - 3835293 – electrical heating aparatus for generating super heated vapors
1975 - 3877642 – freezing nucleant
1975 - 3882393 – communications system utilizing modulation of the characteristic polarization of the ionosphere (haarp – us navy)
1975 - 3896993 – process for local modification of fog and clouds for triggering their precipitation and for hindering the development of hail producing clouds
1975 - 3899144 – powder contrail generation
1975 - 3902934 – gas generating compositions
1976 - 3940059 – method of fog dispersion
1976 - 3940060 – vortex ring generator
1976 - 3990987 – smoke generator
1976 - 3992628 – countermeasure system for laser radiation
1976 - 3994437 – broadcast dissemination of trace quantities of biologically active chemicals
1977 - re29142 – combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process
1977 - 4035726 – method of controlling and/or improving high-latitude and other communications or radio wave surveillance systems by partial control of radio wave et al (haarp – cornelluniv.)
1977 - 4042196 – method and apparatus for triggering a substantial change in earth characteristics and measuring earth changes
1978 - 4096005 – pyrotechnic cloud seeding composition
1978 - 4111911 – method of hardening liquid resols
1978 - 4129252 – method and apparatus for production of seeding materials
1979 - 4141274 – weather modification automatic cartridge dispenser
1979 - 4167008 – fluid bed chaff dispenser
1981 - 4269637 – high-performance mhd solid gas generator
1982 - 4347284 – white cover sheet material capable of reflecting ultraviolet rays
1982 - 4362271 – procedure for the artificial modification of atmospheric precipitation as well as compounds with a dimethyl sulfoxide base for use in carrying out said procedure
1983 - 4402480 – atmosphere modification satellite (space)
1983 - 4412654 – laminar microjet atomizer and method of aerial spraying of liquids
1983 - 4415265 – method and apparatus for aerosol particle absorption spectroscopy
1983 - 4373391 – relative humidity sensitive material
1984 - 4470544 – method of and means for weather modification
1984 - 4475927 – bipolar fog abatement system
1986 - 4600147 – liquid propane generator for cloud seeding apparatus
1987 - 4633714 – aerosol particle charge and size analyzer
1987 - 4643355 – method and apparatus for modification of climatic conditions
1987 - 4653690 – method of producing cumulus clouds
1987 - 4684063 – particulates generation and removal
1987 - 4686605 – method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth’s atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere (haarp – raythen)
1987 - 4704942 – charged aerosol (anti-airborne biological warfare agent)
1987 - 4712155 – method and apparatus for creating an artificial electron cyclotron heating region of plasma (haarp – raytheon)
1988 - 4744919 – method of dispersing particulate aerosol tracer
1988 - 4766725 – method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
1989 - 4829838 – method and apparatus for the measurement of the size of particles entrained in a gas
1989 - 4836086 – apparatus and method for the mixing and diffusion of warm and cold air for dissolving fog
1989 - 4873928 – nuclear-sized explosions without radiation (haarp – raytheon)
1990 - 4948257 – laser optical measuring device and method for stabilizing fringe pattern spacing
1990 - 4948050 – liquid atomizing apparatus for aerial spraying
1990 - 4959559 – (united states) electromagnetic or other directed energy pulse launcher
1991 - 4999637 – creation of artificial ionization clouds above the earth (haarp – raytheon)
1991 - 5003186 – stratospheric welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming
1991 - 5005355 – method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
1991 - 5038664 – method for producing a shell of relativistic particles at an altitude above the earths surface (haarp – raytheon)
1991 - 5041760 – method and apparatus for generating and utilizing a compound plasma configuration
1991 - 5041834 – artificial ionospheric mirror composed of a plasma layer which can be tilted (haarp – raytheon)
1991 - 5056357 – acoustic method for measuring properties of a mobile medium
1991 - 5059909 – determination of particle size and electrical charge
1992 - 5104069 – apparatus and method for ejecting matter from an aircraft
1992 - 5110502 – method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
1992 - 5148173 – millimeter wave screening cloud and method
1992 - 5156802 – inspection of fuel particles with acoustics
1992 - 5174498 – cloud seeding
1993 - 5245290 – device for determining the size and charge of colloidal particles by measuring electroacoustic effect
1994 - 5286979 – process for absorbing ultraviolet radiation using dispersed melanin (wow!)
1994 - 5296910 – method and apparatus for particle analysis
1994 - 5327222 – displacement information detecting apparatus
1994 - 5357865 – method of cloud seeding
1994 - 5360162 – method and composition for precipitation of atmospheric water
1995 - 5383024 – optical wet steam monitor
1995 - 5425413 – method to hinder the formation and to break-up overhead atmospheric inversions, enhance ground level air circulation and improve urban air quality
1995 - 5434667 – characterization of particles by modulated dynamic light scattering
1995 - 5441200 – tropical cyclone disruption (hurricanes!)
1996 - 5486900 – measuring device for amount of charge of toner and image forming apparatus having the measuring device
1996 - 5556029 – method of hydrometeor dissipation (clouds)
1997 - 5628455 – method and apparatus for modification of supercooled fog
1997 - 5631414 – method and device for remote diagnostics of ocean-atmosphere system state
1997 - 5639441 – methods for fine particle formation
1998 - 5762298 – use of artificial satellites in earth orbits adaptively to modify the effect that solar radiation would otherwise have on earth’s weather (space)
1999 - 5912396 – system and method for remediation of selected atmospheric conditions (solar powered blimp to ionize clouds)
1999 - 5922976 – method of measuring aerosol particles using automated mobility-classified aerosol detector
1999 - 5949001 – method for aerodynamic particle size analysis
1999 - 5984239 – weather modification by artificial satellites (space)
2000 - 6025402 – chemical composition for effectuating a reduction of visibility obscuration, and a detoxifixation of fumes and chemical fogs in spaces of fire origin
2000 - 6030506 – preparation of independently generated highly reactive chemical species
2000 - 6034073 – solvent detergent emulsions having antiviral activity
2000 - 6045089 – solar-powered airplane
2000 - 6056203 – method and apparatus for modifying supercooled clouds
2000 - 6110590 – synthetically spun silk nanofibers and a process for making the same
2001 - 6263744 – automated mobility-classified-aerosol detector
2001 - 6281972 – method and apparatus for measuring particle-size distribution
2001 - 6315213 – method of modifying the weather
2002 - 6382526 – process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers
2002 - 6408704 – aerodynamic particle size analysis method and apparatus
2002 - 6412416 – propellant-based aerosol generation devices and method (us army)
2003 - 6520425 – process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers
2003 - 6539812 – system for measuring the flow-rate of a gas by means of ultrasound
2003 - 6553849 – electrodynamic particle size analyzer
2003 - 6569393 – method and device for cleaning the atmosphere
2009 - 7582809 - Sorghum aluminum tolerance gene, SbMATE.Also known as Monsantos Aluminum resestent gene.
2011 - 7965488 – methods of removing aerosols from the atmosphere (ionizing antennas)
2012 - 8152091 – 8152091 – Production or distribution of radiative forcing agents June 4 1974.


HAARP Patents (Assigned to APTI, Inc. Los Angeles, CA, Washington, DC)
*Note HAARP needs Chemtrails jets to spray the sky's so it can be fully effective.

1985 U.S. Patent 4686605: Method And Apparatus For Altering A Region In The Earth’s Atmosphere, Ionosphere, And/Or Magnetosphere Issued: Aug. 11, 1987 Filed: Jan. 10, 1985
1985 U.S. Patent 5038664: Method For Producing A Shell Of Relativistic Particles At An Altitude Above The Earth’s Surface ~ Issued: Aug. 13, 1991 Filed: Jan. 10, 1985
1985 U.S. Patent 4712155: Method And Apparatus For Creating An Artificial Electron Cyclotron Heating Region Of Plasma ~ Issued: Dec. 8, 1987 Filed: Jan. 28, 1985
1988 U.S. Patent 5068669: Power Beaming System ~ Issued: Nov. 26, 1991 Filed: Sep. 1, 1988
1989 U.S. Patent 5218374: Power Beaming System With Printer Circuit Radiating Elements Having Resonating Cavities ~ Issued: June 8, 1993 Filed: Oct. 10, 1989
1986 U.S. Patent 4817495: Defense System For DiscriminatingBetween Objects In Space ~ Issued: Apr. 4, 1989 Filed: Jul. 7, 1986
1987 U.S. Patent 4999637: Creation Of Artificial Ionization Clouds Above The Earth ~ Issued: Mar. 12, 1991 Filed: May. 14, 1987
1987 U.S. Patent 4873928: Nuclear-Sized Explosions Without Radiation ~ Issued: Oct. 17, 1989 Filed: June 15, 1987
1989 U.S. Patent 4954709: High Resolution Directional Gamma Ray Detector ~ Issued: Sep. 4, 1990 Filed: Aug. 16, 1989
1990 U.S. Patent 5041834: Artificial Ionospheric Mirror Composed Of A Plasma Layer Which Can Be Tilted ~ Issued: Aug. 20, 1991 Filed: May. 17, 1990
1991 U.S. Patent 5202689: Lightweight Focusing Reflector For Space ~ Issued: Apr. 13, 1993 Filed: Aug. 23, 1991
1991 U.S. Patent 5293176: Folded Cross Grid Dipole Antenna Element ~ Issued: Mar. 8, 1994 Filed: Nov. 18, 1991



Source: CHEMTRAIL RESEARCH

JUST ADDING 07/04/13 as this Patent has also been discovered and Barium should be considered in the health aspects of the spraying.


BARIUM RELEASE SYSTEM
United States Patent 3751913

Inventors:
Paine; Thomas O. Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space

N/a (Hampton, VA)
Lewis, Beverley W. (Hampton, VA)
Stokes, Charles S. (Willow Grove, VA)
Smith, Edward W. (Exton, PA)
Application Number:
05/059892
Publication Date:
08/14/1973
Filing Date:
07/31/1970
Export Citation:
Click for automatic bibliography generation
Primary Class:
60/215
Other Classes:
149/1, 149/36, 252/62.55, 252/301.4R, 324/244.1
International Classes:
C06D3/00; C06D3/00; (IPC1-7): C06D5/06
Field of Search:
60/211,214,215 252
View Patent Images:

interesting to see the company for which the inventor heads

******

The following is more research just submitted from Marcus Trebellius Maximus .  We've not made time to compare for finding duplicate patents listed from the above list.  Feel free to compare and research those that you have not yet reviewed.  Thank you to our diligent researchers: 
 
microchip and haarp information is also listed
.
Practical Time Machine Using Dynamic Efficient Virtual And Real RobotsUnited States Patent Application 20090234788.........

Liquid hydrogen stratospheric aircraft

United States Patent 6550717.............

Disc-shaped submersible aircraft

United States Patent 5653404...........

Zero Point Energy Rotator Transducer and Associated Methods

United States Patent Application 20100201133............

Subliminal device having manual adjustment of perception level of subliminal messages

United States Patent 5221962.................

Mind controller

United States Patent Application 20030171688.............

Mobile assault logistic kinetmatic engagement device

United States Patent 5020411..............

Device and method for responding to influences of mind

United States Patent Application 20090265112..................

ELECTRON BEAM DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICE AND METHODS OF USING SAME

United States Patent Application 20100171446..............

Extraterrestrial transportation apparatus and methods

United States Patent 5199671.....................

DNA cloning method

United States Patent 6787316.............

Microchip

United States Patent 7687031................

Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere

United States Patent 4686605...................HAARP........but use it in connection with this next patent................

Plasma plume MHD power generator and method

United States Patent 5234183....................

......In order to read the patents go to freepatentsonline....and type in the patent number.....look into the assignees....dates....etc etc...