The Only Way We Can Stop Geoengineering
My name is Clint Richardson and I am writing to you, the good people of America, because now more than ever we need each others help. I don’t want your money, only your time and a little bit of effort on your own behalf…Intent is the foundation of a proper response and action against any problem. At the moment, most of the small percent of an otherwise uninformed population of this world that actually knows about Geo-engineering as a weather modification and control scheme inversely has no idea how to fight such an esoteric and out of reach event (despite their determined intent) – like a bunch of electricians without tools for the job. We feel helpless against it; watching from miles below as the sky becomes dim and while record-breaking temperatures scorch and freeze parts of the Earth that have never known such dramatic variations in temperature. While it is clear that our mutual intent is to stop these psychopathic efforts to alter our climate in any way they can, as we look around for the “solution” to this deleterious alteration of our environment we collectively come up short. Our intent is as a dandelion in the wind; blown in all different directions and so completely unorganized that even millions of people with the same goal cannot make even the slightest dent as a resistance, spreading more and more weeds of confusion and the disappointment of knowledge without remedy.
We beg our supposedly representative legislature to disallow such unprecedented spraying of our skies but are shrugged off with lies and the denial of the very existence of this phenomenon by the very congress and local officials who legally regulate it. And we walk away disappointed and enraged… complaining to our mutual in-activists in the virtual world of “social media” where it makes no difference in the real world – right where these megalomaniacs want us to be.
We congregate in this artificial world of web forums and sites for mutually sympathetic support, ineffectually complaining to each other while in the real world the alteration and poisoning of the entire ecosystem of planet Earth and indeed our now mineral-compounded and poisoned bodies continues without a physical real-world response from the people being poisoned.
And all of this perfectly legal!
We keep repeating to ourselves and our brethren that “knowledge is power”; that we must tell as many people as we can and that this informational exchange will somehow make a difference by “waking up” the sleeping masses. And yet, we offer these masses no answers to their predictable questions of what the hell to do about it. How can we share a problem if we don’t know the solution?
What’s the point?
In typically ironic group-think fashion, the one thing that would actually stop this ever-increasing threat of extinction level Terra-formation of our environment seems to go completely under the radar of even the most ardent of activists – the fact that all of us individually are each entirely responsible for this weather modification without even knowing it. This is simply because we continue to act, vent, protest, and petition in the artificial construct of the internet (The Matrix, if you will) instead of making demands by taking individual legal action – the only action that government understands or is required to act upon.
You see, government acts solely upon the legal consent of the people to its actions. And since silence is considered a form of passive consent, the chemical spraying of the skies moves onward and upward without any legal challenge whatsoever. The fact is that no one is properly making a legal claim against what is happening. And unfortunately this is what government loves – total consent of the people through their ignorance of law and legal silence.
‘But wait just a darn minute there pal…’
You say…
‘I am screaming from the top of my lungs and complaining in web forums and writing pleading personal letters and emails to my congressmen to pretty-pretty please stop allowing this Geo-engineering to happen!!! How can you dare say I am just letting it happen by being silent?’
And therein lies the very legal silence of which I speak…
The truth is that in the legal realm and language of government, the conversational English language spoken by the average man or woman means absolutely nothing. Even the most abjectly voluminous of activists goes unheard by legal governmental ears simply because the activist is speaking a foreign language to government in their efforts of activism. The legal language is not synonymous with the English language, and so you might as well be speaking Chinese. Government responds to legal notices and demands, not to uninformed questions and begging. Government operates via the legal consent of the people under its own written legal codes, and so the fact that the people never speak in the legal language of government equates to the absolute silence of the people in this fictional (legal) realm. We are like a bunch of parrots squawking nonsensically at a bunch of wolfs and rats in fancy suits. A parrot squawks. A wolf barks. So no matter how many letters, emails, requests, nasty-grams, personal confrontations caught on film, or any other form of communications that we the people submit to government, the government is in no way liable or responsible to respond or acknowledge any of our efforts… That is – unless we use the correct language.
Now, let’s get back to our collective yet fractured intent to stop the alteration of our weather and environment and discuss how we can mutually focus it all into a positive action (note that the word “action” is a legal term).
It is my personal intention to place a legal moratorium on all “weather modification” taking place in the State of Utah currently and in the foreseeable future – with the ultimate intent for all States and indeed nations to create the same legal bailiwick. But I cannot do it alone.
After many years of study, I have come to one inevitable conclusion: Weather Modification and Geo-engineering is only able to be done with the legal informed consent of the people, whether they know it or not!
You see, much of what government does on the State or National (federal) level is based on the presumed consent (permission) of all the people to all of its actions (as one group with one vote instead of individuals with independent voices). This is the true conundrum of a “representative” government that relies on the ignorance of the people to its methods of madness and corruption; manufacturing the uncompromisable consent of all people as citizens (voters). Government has become so clever and creative about what has been coined “manufacturing consent” that for the most part, government is now acting in most areas completely outside of the realm of public (the people’s) knowledge or permission, based on this fairytale world of the ignorant consent of the masses without any form of voter approval or even voter comprehension.
And the people wonder why and how “they” get away with it…
Government calls this “informed consent” – all based on the presumption that the consent of the people is given to government’s actions simply because no individuals within the group of represented people have personally withdrawn their consent.
Government has become addicted to this type of manufactured, and thus “presumed” consent only because the major bulk of the people have no idea that their consent is being presumed or is even needed in the first place. But in truth, government cannot use the excuse of acting on the behalf of the people without that very legal informed consent. And so it has mastered the science of openly secret operations that are right in front of the people’s noses – yet completely out of sight and mind – while being perfectly legal and based upon the uncomprehending public consent of the people as citizens in a “body politic”.
Most important to understand here, is that the art of creating the unwitting group “consent of the people” only really requires one little thing – a public notice.
There is but one thing that a public notice creates, and that thing is informed consent. By silence in the form of a lack legal challenges to these government public legal notices, a legal vacuum of non-resistance ultimately is the ultimate result; creating a permissive legal contract between the people and government where the people allow and offer informed consent for what ever that particular public legal notice substantiates within its legal authority.
This is how public roads and real estate built with taxpayer money get sold off to private corporations and become toll roads. The people don’t respond to the notice of intent, thus agreeing to the action of sale or lease.
This is how taxpayers fund private ventures like parking garages and meters which enter later into lease agreements with private bank and corporations, where “infrastructure privatization” allows the banks to keep the fees in 50-year contracts with government that are paid by the taxpayers who built the garages.
This is how back-door deals and outrageous real estate projects are done within the political public realm; funded through taxpayer monies yet never benefiting even one taxpayer, agreed to and voted on in councils without voter approval.
And perhaps you’ve wondered why pharmaceutical companies put 60-90 second infomercials on television telling you as a happy bouncy purple ball or pleasant family scene draws your attention away from what is being disclosed within – stating the side-effects of complete misery and death with that particular pharmaceutical drug? Well folks, this is part 1 of a 2-tiered public notice legal procedure, which directs you in small print 3/4rths of the way through the info-commercial to a much more detailed and legal official printed public notice in some popular magazine or journal publication like Redbook, Health, or Golf Digest. This is a legal public notice of these drugs horrific possible side-effects, creating a legally binding corporate protection from any of these listed side-effects by legal government codes. You were given public notice… so if you take that drug you have limited legal recourse as government statute protect the corporations.
Did you think they did these strange admissions of side-effects for fun? Of course not. This is public disclosure through official legal notice to the public. And government is the main institutional shareholder in all major pharmaceutical companies, so protecting those investments and guaranteeing returns means limiting the legal actions of the people. This public notice process for drug companies was created by government for their protection. The people don’t even know this is happening, and then wonder why when a vaccine destroys theirs or their children’s health, they are forced to go to a special “vaccine court” set up specifically for vaccine injury by government-protected pharmaceutical companies instead of a regular lawful court. The courts protect the corporations and the government who created them, not the people.
All of these actions by government first require public notice and informed consent of the public before they are considered “legal”. And the lack of legal response by any individuals in the group (body politic) continuously creates an open back door where these types of unethical deals, corporate partnerships (PPP) and legal protections happen on a daily basis.
And the people complain and whine… but only do so in their social media/digital worlds – never in the legal realm where it would actually count and where government actually exists – in the artificial world of legal codes.
And without this realization, the most prominent questions out there amongst the people is always the same:
“Our representatives wont listen or even acknowledge that weather modification is happening, so what can we do about it? What is the solution?”
This is the question that ironically is being asked by the very base and foundation of power in government – the people. Without the people and their collective consent, none of this would be happening in the first place. And within this all-too-common conversational question lies the ironically simple legal answer…
It is not that we are asking the wrong question, it is just that we don’t know the legal meaning of the words we use!
And this void of meaning takes all power away from the people.
Here is the most important legal definition you will ever comprehend, for the understanding of this legal concept is the entire basis of corruption and servitude of the people to this rogue government. All you need to know is what you are actually asking… and how to ask the correct question in the correct language.
And so the question should not be ‘what is the solution?’
The question should be ‘what is the legal definition of the word solution?’
SOLUTION, civil law. Payment. 2. By this term, is understood, every species of discharge or liberation, which is called satisfaction, and with which the creditor is satisfied. This term has rather a reference to the substance of the obligation, than to the numeration or counting of the money. Vide Discharge of a contract. –Bouvier’s
Law Dictionary, 1856, (A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution
and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier. Published 1856.)
SOLUTION – Law. Payment or satisfaction of a claim or debt. –American Heritage Dictionary, 4th ed, 2000
SOLUTION - Law. The payment, discharge, or satisfaction of a claim, debt, etc. –Collins English Dictionary, 10th ed, 2009
SOLUTION – Roman Civil Law. Performance of an obligation: payment, discharge, release. –Merriam-Webster online
“…Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it,
and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such
principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem
most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed,
will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for
light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn,
that mankind are more
disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves
by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the
same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism,
it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and
to provide new Guards for their future security.”
It is our mutual consent as the people who are indeed voluntarily governed is what gives the power to government to act upon its own laws – the laws created by the representatives of the consenting people (acting on behalf of the people). And this presumed and unchallenged consent creates not only a contractual claim of government to perform Geo-engineering, but also an obligation to uphold the legal act of Geo-engineering by law. The government is performing its obligation by regulating every jet that flies by and sprays our sky. And with the people’s consent, government claims the right to do this, and gives legal permission for private corporations and military to Geo-engineer the world.
The solution, therefore, is to challenge this legal claim granted by government to itself on behalf of the informed people by withdrawing consent of the contract that allows it – the U.S. CODE and other statutes. Removing consent of all people removes the power of government to act on behalf of all people. Since the individual people do not vote and are not given opportunity to vote for this action taken by government, the government cannot claim the right to do such action lawfully by vote of the people. This is the importance of having corrupt representatives vote in lieu of the actual people. In the case of Geo-engineering, government is acting as a rogue agency without voter approval – but with informed consent of the voters (people). Do you understand the difference?
And because of this, the people must individually be the solution by satisfying the contract (statute) that gives this authority to government. We must individually withdraw consent, thus voiding the substance of the obligation. We must discharge the right of government to alter our weather by severing the one thing that gives such contract power – our individually assumed consent.
Knowing that our mutual silence of presumed consent to the public notice creates a contract of permissive actions by government on behalf of the people who consent to those actions, we can see why these actions and notices are never legally challenged but only conversationally complained about outside the legal realm of government. Holding up a sign, posting a comment on a website, or listening to a radio show is not a legal challenge. Therefore, the weather modification continues at an unprecedented rate.
Government is doing nothing but preforming its obligation of law by allowing and regulating areal spraying within a State or nationally. The people consent to that law by not stating or responding to public notice of intent in a legal demand that their non-consent is not granted. In other words, government is just following its own law and doing nothing illegal. Government has offered a chance to the people for rebuttal of that law (remedy), and the people have chosen not to take that opportunity (through their ignorance of governments legal functionality) by the simple act of inaction (silence is consent). Government is doing nothing more than satisfying an obligation of law (contract) by participating in Geo-engineering. And since government is nothing but a representative body of the people under it, weather modification is a contractually substantive legal requirement.
It’s all legal because the people don’t legally challenge the law.
A logical person would generally speculate that with just a simple look up, this should be enough to make people and even our corrupt politicians question ‘what has become of our once beautiful blue sky?’ With a now reported 20% “global dimming” – the atmospheric obstruction of the ability of the sun’s rays to reach the surface of Earth, I think it is finally time for the people acknowledge and break free of their group mentality, and to individually stand up and say “No, I do not consent!“
This is not something a group can do with one legal paper or within a “class-action lawsuit”, but is instead something that must be done by many individuals independent of each other and yet with uniformity. The government would like nothing more than for the resistance movement against any tyranny of government to continue as it is – with people joining groups while ignoring the power of their own self. Legally speaking, a group with one lawsuit is far less powerful and easier to control than many individuals standing up for their individual rights individually. The people must be organized without allowing an organization to act for them (like government does) on their behalf. The people must be organized without joining an organization! And so the people must act with individual voices.
I am but one man, and the unified voice of many individuals is needed.
So here is my lofty plan…
–=–
You Are A Conspiracy
–=–
You Are A Conspiracy
–=–
First and foremost, we must stop using or acknowledging this word conspiracy.
And we must find a way to subvert the ridiculous criticism that follows
this word by simply defining it in a rational way so as to make its use
pointless and fallacious.
This is actually way more easy than you might think.
You see, everything man-made is in fact a conspiracy!
When you were born, your mother and father
participated in a plan to copulate for the purposes of reproduction. You
were the end result, even if your birth was accidental. You were a plan
of action between two people – the very definition of the word
conspiracy.
Do you have a vegetable garden? Well then
you have participated in a conspiracy to grow food with the providers of
the seeds that you planted and gave money to in exchange for them, the
fertilizer you used, and the city water supply you irrigated with –
meaning that the government water utility was also in on the conspiracy
to grow your garden.
Your home was built through a conspiratorial
effort between laborers, plumbers, roofers, electricians, architects,
city planners, and the bank or government bond that funded its building,
amongst many others.
There is not one thing on this planet made by man that was not created out of conspiracy!
For a conspiracy is nothing but a plan, usually between two or more people.
Every legislation or action taken by the
government is a conspiracy between councilmen, congressmen and the
President, indirectly consented to by all the people in one massive
debacle of a conspiracy. The only reason that most of these things are
not considered a criminal conspiracy is that government itself
says in its own laws what is criminal and legal by that same
conspiratorial legislation consented to by the people (whether they know
they are part of the conspiracy or not). The law-makers decide what is
legal, thus the law is virtually lawless in government, as we will
shortly prove.
If everything is a conspiracy than nothing is.
Don’t let this ridiculous word effect your
intent and drive to end this waking nightmare of Geo-engineering. This
word literally means nothing, especially as a fallacious insult or ad
hominem attack.
If this was not true, I’d have quit a long time ago.
Moving on…
–≈–
The Public Notice
–≈–
The Public Notice
–≈–
Remember, the first step towards the
implementation any governmental action or plan (conspiracy) is to create
what is called a public notice, usually entered into the public record
in the form of a newspaper “public legal notice”. This oh- so important
step in the process of manufacturing consent is without a doubt the
largest piece of the puzzle for the government’s gaining of informed
consent by the people for its draconian actions. By placing a public
notice into a series of newspapers and other “public” outlets,
government can afterwords state that the public was given “informed consent”
about government’s future actions and intent, including public hearings
on these actions, since these published newspaper public notices are
legally considered a full public disclosure.
There’s only problem… seldom do average,
everyday people casually read the public notice section of their local
newspaper – if they even read the paper at all. And this fact is quite
well-known to government.
For our purposes, I will be mostly referring
to the State of Utah where I live for the presentment of how the people
of Utah are tricked each year into consenting to Geo-engineering. But
this method of informed consent is methodically uniform in all States,
Federally, and internationally. For the public notice is indeed the
oldest modern form of public disclosure.
Here’s how that works…
In September of 2012, the following public
“NOTICE OF INTENT” was placed into the Salt Lake Tribune (Salt Lake
County area) as well as many other “local” newspapers across the state
of Utah. Of course, the taxpayers ironically fund these government
notices with their forced taxation.
NOTICE OF INTENT – WEATHER MODIFICATION
North American Weather Consultants, 8180 South Highland Dr., Suite B-2, Sandy, Utah 84093, a contractor licensed by the Utah Division of Water Resources, intends to conduct weather modification programs in Utah to increase precipitation with the following potential sponsors: Utah Water Resources Development Corporation
(representing Beaver, Emery, Garfield, Iron, Juab, Millard, Piute,
Sanpete, Sevier, Tooele, Washington and Wayne Counties), Box Elder and
Cache Counties, the Bear River Water Conservancy District, Provo River
Water Users Association, Weber Basin Water Conservancy District,
Duchesne County Water Conservancy District, Uintah Water Conservancy
District, Central Utah Water Conservancy District and Alta and Snowbird
ski areas. The areas in which the effects are intended to occur are in
the mountainous portions of Washington, eastern Iron, eastern Beaver,
eastern Millard, eastern Juab, eastern Tooele, eastern Utah, eastern
Salt Lake, eastern Davis, eastern Weber, Morgan, Box Elder, Cache,
western Rich, Summit, northern Duchesne, northern Uintah, southern
Daggett, Wasatch, western Carbon, Sanpete, western Emery, Sevier, Piute,
western Wayne, western Garfield, northwest Kane, San Juan, and southern
Grand Counties. The operations may be conducted during portions of the period from October 15, 2012 to May 31, 2013. Weather modification operations will be conducted using ground based, silver iodide nuclei generators. Limited aircraft seeding may be conducted for research purposes.
Persons interested in this permit
application should contact the Utah Division of Water Resources: 1594
West North Temple, P.O. Box 146201, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114,
telephone (801) 707-8820.
NORTH AMERICAN WEATHER CONSULTANTS
Don A. Griffith, CCM President
8180 South Highland Dr., Suite B-2 Sandy, Utah 84093
Don A. Griffith, CCM President
8180 South Highland Dr., Suite B-2 Sandy, Utah 84093
(Source–> http://utahlegals.com/notice.php?id=159078)
NOTICE OF INTENT – WEATHER MODIFICATION
Emery Water Conservancy District, P.O. Box 998, Castle Dale, Utah 84513 intends to conduct weather modification programs in Utah to increase precipitation.
The area in which the effects are intended to occur are in the higher
elevation snowpack accumulation regions in portions of Eastern Sanpete
and Western Carbon and Emery Counties. The operations may be conducted
during portions of the period from December 1, 2011 to April 15, 2012.
Weather modification operations will be conducted using automated liquid propane dispensers.
Persons interested in this permit
application should contact the Utah Division of Water Resources; 1594
West North Temple, Box 146201, Salt Lake City, UT 84114-6201, telephone
(801)538-7269.
Emery Water Conservancy District
Jay Mark Humphrey, Manager
P.O. Box 998
Castle Dale, UT 84513
Jay Mark Humphrey, Manager
P.O. Box 998
Castle Dale, UT 84513
Published in the Emery County Progress September 13, 20 and 27, 2011.
And though it is too late to stop either of
these, here is the Public Notice and NOTICE OF INTENT of WEATHER
MODIFICATION for the winter of 2010-2011: Link–> http://utahlegals.com/notice.php?id=60319
–=–
The debate over weather modification
(Geo-engineering) being a real and provable event is certainly over. It
is an obvious forgone conclusion backed by the laws of the United States
and the United Nations that the lines in the sky are purposefully
man-made, and that these are specifically used for “weather
modification”.
This industry is actually well regulated and quite organized, as we will see…
–=–
But They Are Just Making Snow, Right?
–=–
But They Are Just Making Snow, Right?
–=–
Anyone who has been skiing before has
probably seen or heard about the creation of fake snow through
ground-based weather modification devices such as the ones mentioned
above. Indeed, they have been in operation for many decades at ski
resorts across the world. Ironically, most people don’t give this fact a
second thought, even when stating their contradictory disbelief in
“chemtrails”, “Geo-engineering”, and “weather modification”. And
unfortunately, most people believe this endeavor to be a harmless and
innocent modification to the natural ecosystem – as if there is such a
thing.
In declaring this “Notice of Intent”, the government has done a very sneaky thing. They have declared their intent to do experimental research via
weather modification (Geo-engineering) in the same paragraph as the
modifications done for ski resorts and farming belts. Thus, the reader
might dismiss this intent as one of saving crops or creating snow for tourism for the benefit of the citizenry and farmers.
But I assure you, “research purposes” is a
very dangerous, obtuse, and mufti-faceted description of many dangerous,
untested, and unnecessary Geo-engineering projects conducted
world-wide. These types of obscure open-ended statements allow almost
anything to happen in government. And the act of placing this into an
otherwise harmless seeming Public Notice is the root of our hazy,
polluted, and dimmed skies…
And so, for the purposes and intent of my
campaign, we now know the intent of government through its own legal
notice to the public – which is to conduct research on the weather
through the experimental modification and engineering of the atmosphere
and to create legal modification of the weather for certain unnamed
“research” purposes.
To this, I do not consent!!!
But how do I tell this to government so that it will actually be forced to consider my non-consent???
For this, I must have a legal solution…
But first, I must understand where the
statutes (laws) come from that make all of this legal on a national and
international level.
–≈–
The Laws Of Weather Modification
–≈–
The Laws Of Weather Modification
–≈–
Before we can move forward with this plan of
action to stop Utah’s government from modifying the weather of the
State for “research purposes” and allowing the Federal government from
doing the same, we need to obtain the statutes (legal codes) that
accompany the process of this weather modification process. Since I am
in the State of Utah, I will be focusing on this State. However, no
matter what State you live in, the Codes will likely be uniform in their
legal language if not exact, and it is fact that the same manufactured
consent is being conducted in your own areas, for many different
purposes – including weather modification.
You will soon be getting a public notice of your own in your local newspaper.
Will you consent?
Let’s take a look at what public laws (statutes) regulate weather modification?
Since areal spraying is a cross-border
effort miles high in the atmosphere on a national and world-wide front,
let’s first go to the Federal (national) level so that we can understand
the true nature of this thing we call government, and how it justifies
this weather modification scheme. Please understand that the following
US CODE is the law, and it allows government to justify unimaginable
things to the human, animal, and plant kingdom – as well as to
completely alter the environment at its whim and with total disregard
for the people or any other life-form on the planet. It is from this
Federal law that States are justified in allowing Geo-engineering and
other biological weapons testing to take place amongst all the
“citizenry” with their unknown and yet voluntary informed consent.
Firstly, the Federal Government must define
what Weather Modification is within its legal codes. It does so in TITLE
15: COMMERCE AND TRADE:
15 USC § 330 – Definitions
As used in this chapter—
(1) The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of Commerce.
(2) The term “person”
means any individual, corporation, company, association, firm,
partnership, society, joint stock company, any State or local government
or any agency thereof, or any other organization, whether commercial or nonprofit, who is performing weather modification activities, except where acting solely as an employee, agent, or independent contractor of the Federal Government.
(3) The
term “weather modification” means any activity performed with the
intention of producing artificial changes in the composition, behavior,
or dynamics of the atmosphere.
(4) The term “United
States” includes the several States, the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or insular possession of
the United States.
Now that the government has clearly defined
what “weather modification” is within its codes, we can safely search
for other legal codes that regulate this process.
The above definition was taken from 15 USC
Chapter 9A, entitled: “WEATHER MODIFICATION ACTIVITIES OR ATTEMPTS;
REPORTING REQUIREMENT”.
Section 330e of this CODE also states:
15 USC § 330e – Authorization of appropriations
There are authorized to be appropriated
$150,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1972, $200,000 each for the
fiscal years 1973 through 1980, $100,000 for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 1981, $100,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30,
1986, $100,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1987, $100,000
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1988, to carry out the
provisions of this chapter.
But this goes far beyond just implicit knowledge of these weather modifications by congress, for the act of weather modification is actually required to be reported to government!
15 USC § 330a – Report requirement; form; information; time of submission
No person may engage, or attempt to engage, in any weather modification activity in the United States unless he submits to the Secretary such reports with respect thereto,
in such form and containing such information, as the Secretary may by
rule prescribe. The Secretary may require that such reports be submitted
to him before, during, and after any such activity or attempt.
Remember, though the Secretary refers to the Secretary of Commerce as defined above, this is the US CODE created by congress.
Don’t let the different departments fool you into thinking that
congress is not complicit in all things in “conspiracy” with the
President and all of the Executive activities and Cabinets. The greatest
con-job on the American people is the illusion of competition and
separation between government branches. Don’t fall for it. Government is
one giant corporation, with many sub-corporate structures that are all
part of the whole. Independence of such entities as the Federal Reserve
is a fallacy – for natural independence does not exist in government, only political
independence. No government entity is above the law. However, some are
allowed by Congress to make their own rules. But rules never carry more
weight than laws, and independent agencies of government are never
actually outside of the incorporated structure of government.
You just have to realize that government
itself makes its own laws, and creates the ways in which it is exempt
from those self-induced laws. It does this through what I call
“exception clauses”.
Very tricky. Here, let me show you…
Remember that the following are the codes (“laws”) created by congress to control the Department of Defense, and are not created by the DOD itself.
TITLE 50 of US CODE is entitled the “WAR AND
NATIONAL DEFENSE”, and CHAPTER 32 is entitled “CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL
WARFARE PROGRAM”. This TITLE applies to both foreign and domestic use of
the following:
50 USC § 1520a – Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents
(a) Prohibited activities
The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)—
(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.
(b) Exceptions
Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e) of this section, the prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:
(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.
(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.
(c) Informed consent required
The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) of this section only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject.
(d) Prior notice to Congress
Not later than 30
days after the date of final approval within the Department of Defense
of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department
of Defense (whether directly or under contract) involving the use of
human subjects for the testing of a chemical agent or a biological
agent, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed
Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House
of Representatives a report setting forth a full accounting of those
plans, and the experiment or study may then be conducted only after the
end of the 30-day period beginning on the date such report is received
by those committees.
(e) “Biological agent” defined
In this section, the
term “biological agent” means any micro-organism (including bacteria,
viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious
substance, and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized
component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance,
whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable of
causing—
(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or
(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.
Please note that paragraph (B) of this
section is of the utmost importance to comprehend. In government, most
of the laws it creates and codifies within the US CODE have this type of
“exception” clause, giving the illusion of just law. Generally
speaking, this type of legal language creates in the same writing of
legal code both a law and an exemption from that same law. Here we see
that for the “peaceful purposes of medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical,
agricultural, industrial, or research activity” listed, Section (B) of
this code is nullified by the exception and allows government to
literally do everything bad in this CODE – including death and altering
the environment.
Therefore, Section (A) and everything listed as
prohibited within this CODE is actually legal and permissible
by government and its contractors (private corporations and foreign
governments). Therefore, in truth and in law, we can virtually ignore
the term “Prohibited Activities” in Section (A) of this CODE since
government is completely immune from it as listed in Section (B). This
CODE specifically states that “any test or experiment involving the
use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population;
or… any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human
subjects” is perfectly legal and acceptable under the law since
government and its private contractors are totally immune to this law in
this CODE.
Thus… THE LAW IS LAWLESS!!!
And within this description, can anyone tell
me what in the world is not considered to be a “peaceful purpose” while
falling under the category of either “medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity“?
Weather modification is certainly used
agriculturally and is defined above as a “research activity” in our Utah
Public Notice. What in this world could not be considered “research”?
In short, this list of “purposes” truly places total impunity and
freedom for government to utilize chemical biological agents on the
people of the Untied States under “peace time” conditions.
Again, these restrictions are restriction-less!
In Section (E) we see that the definition of
these perfectly legal biological agents that can be used on any and all
humans and upon all of lifeforms of Earth are defined as being
wholeheartedly a “deleterious alteration of the environment” that can cause “death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism…“
But perhaps the most important line item
within these legal permissions is within Section (C) – the requirement
of informed consent of the very people being sprayed with biological
agents!!!
Did you know that you consent to be tested upon, America? That is all 315,498,000 million of you?
You see, the only way for government to have this type of power is of course with the consent of the people. Therefore, informed consent
is a requirement for this or any other U.S. CODE to be just, and
requires the voluntary consent of an informed public (victims). Of
course the people certainly never were given a ballot to vote for and
approve biological testing upon themselves!
But that doesn’t matter. The people’s vote is irrelevant if their consent can be manufactured.
In other words, the multiple biological
weapons tests that have taken place both in the United States and abroad
have all been allowed by a the very people those biological weapons
have been tested upon – you, the people (group). Your consent through
legal silence has been manufactured in this way, leaving a confused and
angry American people completely ignorant of their own agreement as to
the contractual nature of this “deleterious alteration” of their very
own environment.
50 USC § 1519 – Lethal binary chemical munitions
(a) Notwithstanding any
other provision of law, none of the funds authorized to be appropriated
by this or any other Act shall be used for the purpose of production of
lethal binary chemical munitions unless the President certifies to Congress that the production of such munitions is essential to the national interest
and submits a full report thereon to the President of the Senate and
the Speaker of the House of Representatives as far in advance of the
production of such munitions as is practicable.
(b) For purposes of this section the term “lethal binary chemical munitions” means:
(1) any toxic chemical (solid, liquid, or gas) which, through its chemical properties, is intended to be used to produce injury or death to human beings, and
(2) any unique device, instrument, apparatus, or contrivance, including any components or accessories thereof, intended to be used to disperse or otherwise disseminate any such toxic chemical.
Again, we see a prohibition of some act
followed by an “exception clause” that allows that prohibited by law act
to be conducted – the word “unless”. If a report is filed to Congress
in advance of the killing or injury, then its all just perfectly fine.
Truly, the law is lawless in the halls of government.
In this case, we must consider something
else here that is very important to comprehend. The word “intended” has a
very specific meaning that creates a purposeful act of harm by
government against the people, which is why this code is labeled as
“Biological Weapons“.
With this disposition, where the lawful intention is to actually do
harm to the populace (humans), is it even conceivable to postulate that
any accidental harm or collateral damage being done to the
human, animal, and plant kingdom or environmental has any relevance,
remorse, or legal recourse whatsoever? In other words, if purposeful destruction of life and environment is OK in the law, what in God’s name would make you think that accidental
destruction of life and the environment would not be OK in government’s
eyes? Do you really think that if purposeful murder is exempted from
law that accidental murder is not?
Here we see that the “dispersal or other
dissemination” of “any toxic chemical (solid, liquid, or gas)” that will
“produce injury or death to human beings” is perfectly justified by US
CODE, as long as the exception clause is met by government to
file a report on the record of such proceedings – which is once again to
be considered informed consent of the people, since the representatives
are the voice of the people.
And so I ask you, my fellow activists… Do
you really expect your politicians to answer your angry letters when
they are the very people who created such dastardly laws? Your death is a
reasonable and legal consequence of “research activities” folks, and
Geo-engineering is done by your “informed consent” as written within
this code. In other words, you consent to your own victim-hood should
you or your children, your pets, livestock, crops, or anything else in
this world be harmed or killed by weather modifications as research
activities and for agricultural purposes.
You see, the congress is the people,
representing us all regardless of how or even if we voted. As
representatives of the people of the States, congress is accepting this
“certification” for the use of biological weapons and this is considered
“informed consent” to and of the people through our “representatives”.
For our purposes, we may as well just accept the fact that as long as
the subjects (citizens; we) are not acting on our own individual behalf
and instead consenting to having representatives as their voice of
consent, then again the only “people” within the United States that have
a voice are really the congress men and women themselves.
This is why democracy as majority rule
through representatives is perhaps more nightmarish scenario than any
dictatorship imaginable. The illusion of choice is so much more devious
than the knowledge of having no choice…
Along this line of authoritarian governance, we also find within this chapter another bombshell:
After November 19, 1969, the operation of this chapter, or any portion thereof, may be suspended by the President during the period of any war declared by Congress and during the period of any national emergency declared by Congress or by the President.
But we must still never forget the most important aspect of this absurd power of the President… IT WAS GRANTED BY CONGRESS!!!
For those of you unfamiliar with the past and current state of the already declared national emergencies, you should know that since 1933 with President Roosevelt’s emergency declaration for (a war against) the “Great Depression”, each new president has declared new national emergencies which have perpetually kept the United States in this “period” of a state of national emergency. Obama, for instance, declared a national emergency for the so-called “swine flu” of 2009, creating the justification not only to suspend all law, but to create a mandate for mandatory vaccination programs and the laws that protect it. This horrifying state of government essentially makes congress meek (by its own accord allowed in its own US CODE) while the presidential dictator has the authority to do as he pleases (as long as he files a report to congress, lol!). Currently, we are in a perpetual state of national emergency in a war against the word “terrorism” – a nondescript moniker that allows the United States military to enter any country unlawfully and violently in pursuit of “terrorists”. Of course, a terrorist is not a country or a government, no more than it is a military force. It is an imaginary straw-man that justifies the worse kind of “legal” criminal behavior by the Executive CIA and Deptartment of Defense (also both created by Congress to have powers outside of congressional reach by the Congress itself).
When a president can at a whim suspend any written law, truly there is no law. And the suspension of this law in US CODE would simply mean that the president has free reign to do what he pleases with biological weapons without filing a report to congress (the “people”) and with absolutely no restrictions.
Consider this: If the president wished, at any time he could declare global warming, global cooling, climate change, or whatever key-word of the day is being floated around the media that month as a “national emergency”. Thus, this entire chapter of code would mean absolutely nothing, and there would be no limits upon the use of biological agents at all to combat the emergency. Now consider that this section does not specify what type of emergency is to be declared, only that any emergency is in fact declared.
The law is lawless…
But the illusion of law and justice is much easier to sell to an ignorant citizenry than the reality of our government as a totalitarian entity, and so the US CODE is good enough to justify Geo-engineering and other biological weapons and testing on the human population – and for “the deleterious alteration of our environment”.
The next Section is a prohibition and also an exemption upon the delivery of these biological agents:
50 USC § 1516 – Delivery systems
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act shall be used for the procurement of delivery systems specifically designed to disseminate lethal chemical or any biological warfare agents, or for the procurement of delivery system parts or components specifically designed for such purpose, unless the President shall certify to the Congress that such procurement is essential to the safety and security of the United States.
It also states that congress shall appropriate no funds towards the procurement of “delivery systems” (i.e. modified aircraft) “to disseminate lethal chemical or any biological agents” unless…
Note here that the word “any” in front of “biological agents” literally means that “any” form of biological agent can be utilized and “disseminated” over the skies of the United States. For the purposes of this sentence, we do not go to a modern English language dictionary for the definition of “biological agent”. We go back to 50 USC/Section 1520a/Paragraph (e) – which states again:
(e) “Biological agent” defined
In this section, the term “biological
agent” means any micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi,
rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and any
naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such
micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its origin
or method of production, that is capable of causing—
(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or
(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.
Thus, “any” “biological agent” (as defined here in this CODE) can be procured and utilized upon the American people. This includes any thing used and mixed within the Geo-engineering for its “delivery” and “dissemination”. Literally, the sky’s the limit (pun intended)!
If you haven’t gotten the clue yet, Geo-engineering is a chemical weapon – placing chemicals in the sky to combat “climate change”. In legal language, such as with the word “terrorist”, any thing or concept can be made an “enemy” for which to fight.
This fact is certainly spoken about within military (DOD) documents such as “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025“
Excerpt:
What Do We Mean by “Weather-modification”?
Today, weather-modification is the
alteration of weather phenomena over a limited area for a limited period
of time.9 Within the next three decades, the concept of
weather-modification could expand to include the ability to shape
weather patterns by influencing their determining factors.10 Achieving
such a highly accurate and reasonably precise weather-modification
capability in the next 30 years will require overcoming some challenging but not insurmountable technological and legal hurdles…
…in the authors’ judgment, the technical
obstacles preventing their application appear insurmountable within 30
years.12 If this were not the case, such applications would have been
included in this report as potential military options, despite their controversial and potentially malevolent nature and their inconsistency with standing UN agreements to which the US is a signatory.
On the other hand, the
weather-modification applications proposed in this report range from
technically proven to potentially feasible. They are similar, however,
in that none are currently employed or envisioned for employment by our
operational forces. They are also similar in their potential value for the war fighter of the future, as we hope to convey in the following chapters. A notional integrated system that incorporates weather-modification tools
will be described in the next chapter; how those tools might be applied
are then discussed within the framework of the Concept of Operations in
chapter 4…
(Listed sources in report):
10 William Bown, “Mathematicians Learn How to Tame Chaos,” New Scientist, 30 May 1992, 16.
11 CJCSI 3810.01, Meteorological and
Oceanographic Operations, 10 January 95. This CJCS Instruction
establishes policy and assigns responsibilities for conducting
meteorological and oceanographic operations. It also defines the terms
widespread, long-lasting, and severe, in order to
identify those activities that US forces are prohibited from conducting
under the terms of the UN Environmental Modification Convention.
Widespread is defined as encompassing an area on the scale of several
hundred km; long-lasting means lasting for a period of months, or
approximately a season; and severe involves serious or significant disruption or harm to human life, natural and economic resources, or other assets.
12 Concern about the unintended consequences of attempting to “control” the weather is well justified.
Weather is a classic example of a chaotic system (i.e., a system that
never exactly repeats itself). A chaotic system is also extremely
sensitive: minuscule differences in conditions greatly affect outcomes…
End Excerpt.
See the Space.com article entitled “U.S. Military Wants To Own The Weather” here:For more information on the part that the United Nations plays in this, as well as international treaties applied to Geo-engineering and statutes from all over the country and world, see my previous research here:
And for other research tips and help in locating weather modification projects and terminology through your own internet searches, please consider my article here:
And let’s not forget the “Space Preservation Act of 2001″, HR 2977, which was introduced by Representative Dennis Kucinich. It stated:
Sec. 7. DEFINITITIONS. In this Act:
(2)(A) “The terms ‘weapon’ and ‘weapons system’ mean a device capable of any of the following: (ii) Inflicting
death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the
biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic
well-being of a person)–(III) by expelling chemical or biological agents
in the vicinity of a person.”
Section 7, 2 (C) “The
term ‘exotic weapons systems’ includes weapons designed to damage space
or NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or
CLIMATE, WEATHER, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.”
LINK–> http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/107/hr2977 (Note: This bill did not pass, nor did its 2002 predecessor.)
“New Zealand and the United States
conducted thousands of secret tests attempting to create a “tsunami
bomb” during World War Two, a New Zealand author has claimed.
About 3,700 bombs were exploded off Auckland’s Whangaparaoa Peninsula and New Caledonia in the operation, dubbed “Project Seal”.
The operation found a series of 10 large
offshore explosions could generate a 10 metre tsunami, according to
research by Kiwi author and film-maker Ray Waru.
“Presumably if the atomic bomb had not worked as well as it did, we might have been tsunami-ing people,” Mr Waru told the Telegraph.
Mr Waru told the Telegraph the
project was launched in 1944 after US naval officer E A Gibson noted
that blasts used to clear coral reefs around Pacific Islands often
created a large wave.
He found the plans in military files in
the national archives and has published his discoveries in the book,
Secrets and Treasures.
The files reportedly said initial testing
was positive, however the project was ditched in early 1945. It was
concluded that a single explosion would not be powerful enough to
generate a tsunami, but a line of about 2 million kilograms of
explosives about 8km from shore could create a giant wave capable of
inundating a small city.”
50 USC § 1512 – Transportation,
open air testing, and disposal; Presidents determination; report to
Congress; notice to Congress and State Governors
None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or any other Act may be used for the
transportation of any lethal chemical or any biological warfare agent to
or from any military installation in the United States, or the open air testing of any such agent within the United States, or the disposal of any such agent within the United States until the following procedures have been implemented… (see US CODE for full details)
On that note, I think we have now well established the Federal precedent for Geo-engineering and that our government is not in any way concerned with the effects of that practice upon the human or any other population.
So now let’s move on to the local level – the very thing that allows National fly-by’s of weather modification planes over State lands where people reside.
–=–
State Statutes
–=–
State Statutes
–=–
On the State level, we begin with the Utah
State Code, Title 17, Chapter 15, Section 3, which will be similar in
your own state and not hard to find:
Water and Irrigation.
Chapter 15: Modification of Weather
Section 3: Cloud
seeding to increase precipitation — Control of Division of Water
Resources — Powers and authority of division — “Cloud seeding” and
“cloud-seeding project” defined:
The state of Utah through the Division of Water Resources shall be the only entity, private or public, that shall have authority to authorize cloud-seeding research, evaluation, or implementation projects to alter precipitation, cloud forms, or meteorological parameters within the state of Utah, except cloud seeding for the suppression of fog; and frost prevention measures
for the protection of orchards and crops are excluded from the coverage
of this act. The Division of Water Resources shall authorize and may
sponsor or develop local or state-wide cloud-seeding projects that conform to over-all state water planning objectives and are determined to be feasible by the Division of Water Resources. The Division of Water Resources may contract with the Utah water research laboratory or any other individual or organization
for consultation and/or assistance in developing cloud-seeding projects
or in furthering necessary research of cloud seeding or other factors
that may be affected by cloud-seeding activities. Cloud seeding as used in this act shall be construed to mean all acts undertaken to artificially distribute or create nuclei in cloud masses for the purposes of altering precipitation, cloud forms, or other meteorological parameters. A cloud-seeding project as used in this act shall be a planned project to evaluate meteorological conditions, perform cloud seeding, and evaluate results.
Research purposes…
From this Utah State Code we now know that
the “Utah Division of Water Resources” is the only agency that has
authority to authorize cloud seeding (weather modification) in the skies
above the State of Utah for experimental purposes other than fog
suppression. Thus the Utah Division of Water Resources shall be the
focus of our legal demand of non-consent.
Continuing with the “1973 CLOUD SEEDING TO INCREASE PRECIPITATION ACT”, Title 73, Chapter 15 in Utah State Code:
Section 4. Water from cloud seeding part of natural water supply — Notice of intent prior to cloud-seeding project.
All water derived as a result of cloud seeding shall be considered a part of the natural water supply
of the basin in the same sense as if no cloud seeding operations had
been conducted, and any water so derived shall not be subject to new
appropriations but shall be administered and distributed to users on the
stream system in accordance with existing water rights. A notice of intent shall be filed with the Division of Water Rights prior to the commencement of a cloud-seeding project.
Ah, so now we have confirmed that by law a
“notice of intent” must also be filed for all cloud-seeding projects in
order to inform the public and to attain its silent, un-challenging
consent through another independent agency – the Division of Water
Rights. Bear in mind that both of these government offices are “special
districts” which are run by not elected but appointed officials. Please
also note that “water rights” in Utah are not for the people, but are
actually similar to stock certificates for those who hold the stock in
those rights, like farmers and the “City” municipal corporations, which
then sells that water back to the people through the water district –
another appointed business office of government at the taxpayers
expense. Never forget that you are also a customer of government, not just a taxpayer.
Section 5. Transfer of records and data to division — Establishment of reporting and record-keeping procedures.
All records and data
collected by the department of meteorology of the state school of mines
and mineral industries of the University of Utah since March 14, 1953,
shall be transferred to the Division of Water Resources, there to be a permanent record. The
Division of Water Resources shall establish forms and/or criteria for
reporting data and record keeping and cause that a permanent record is
kept of all pertinent data related to cloud-seeding projects,
cloud-seeding research projects, or research related to other factors that may be affected by cloud-seeding activities.
And now we know that a permanent record is
kept by the Utah Division of Water Resources of all or most weather
modification projects sponsored by the State, both past and present, as
well as for any “other factors” of which that climate modification might
have affected. And we know that all of this data was transferred into
to this incorporated district. And none of these projects were ever
approved by voters. Instead, they were conducted without comprehension
and without asking. Good to know…
Section 6. Cloud-seeding contractors — Registration
Any individual or organization that would like to become a cloud-seeding contractor in the state of Utah shall register with the Division of Water Resources.
As a part of the registration the applicant shall meet qualifications
established by the Division of Water Resources and submit proof of financial responsibility in order to give reasonable assurance of protection to the public in the event it should be established that damages were caused to third parties as a result of negligence in carrying out a cloud-seeding project.
And now we know that there is a list within
this agency that shows all past and future weather modification projects
and the private contracted corporations who carried them out via a
registration record. And more importantly, we now know that they have no
special protection by government, and these private corporations as contractors can be sued for damages by the people for causing harm.
We also now know that “cloud-seeding” is not
necessarily safe, and is certainly harmful in some possible
circumstances that are unstated here in Section 6. This likely means
that somewhere in these same records, there exists research and a
listing of potential damages which can be induced by weather
modification.
Section 7. Precipitation caused by authorized project not presumed to constitute trespass or nuisance.
The mere dissemination of materials and substances into the atmosphere or causing precipitation pursuant to an authorized cloud-seeding project shall
not give rise to any presumption that such use of the atmosphere or
lands constitutes trespass or involves an actionable or enjoinable
public or private nuisance.
Here, government has made a public
declaration of the fact that just the physical act of spraying heavy
metals and toxins into the air is apparently not to be considered a
public or private nuisance. This declaratory statement is a ridiculous
opinion, of course, and really means that the government or these
private corporations are somewhat protected by government CODE just by
this stated opinion. This simply means that it must be proven that a
nuisance or trespass has occurred, and that the fact that the spraying
occurred in the first place is not grounds for legal action alone.
Damage or harm must be shown aside from just the spraying itself.
Note that this is why just speaking, holding
up a sign, signing a petition, or yelling from the top of your lungs to
stop spraying our skies is never and never will be enough to halt the
spraying, as we can read here. Government counts on the public’s lack of
legal knowledge and power to withdraw consent in order to function
against the wishes of the still-consenting-without-realizing-it
protesters. This unrealized consent is similar to protesting the Federal
Reserve while the activists still are spending Federal Reserve Notes to
purchase the materials to make up their protest signs. The use
(spending) is the consent to the legitimacy of the Fed and its Federal
currency, and the non-legal protest means absolutely nothing to
government.
Withdrawal of consent is a legal process
requiring notarization through the mail system. It is definitely not the
act of placing clever and colored Sharpie and Magic Marker doodles all
over a cardboard sign attached to a 10×2 piece of wood and standing in
front of some government building begging and pleading for them to stop
poisoning the atmosphere.
If you want to protest, do it right – legally claim your non-consent! See the end of this article for this info…
Chapter 8. Cloud seeding in Utah to target area in adjoining state.
Cloud seeding in Utah to target an area in an adjoining state is prohibited except
upon full compliance of the laws of the target area state the same as
if the cloud-seeding operation took place in the target area state, as
well as the other provisions of this act.
Ah, so here we have established cross-border jurisdictions set up to ensure proper coverage.
We can then look at a more detailed
description of the rules relating to weather modification
(cloud-seeding) at the “Utah Division of Administrative Rules”. And this
is very important to our goals:
R653-5-7. Procedures for Acquisition of Permit.
(1) Application for Permit: To qualify for a cloud seeding permit a licensee must:
(g) File with the Division, within 15 days from the last date of the publication of notice, proof that the applicant caused the notice of intention to be published at least once a week for three consecutive weeks in a newspaper having a general circulation within each county in which the operation is to be conducted and in which the affected area is located. Publication of notice shall not commence until the applicant has received approval of the form and substance of the notice of intention from the Director.
And so here we have come full circle back to
our public notice of intent in the Salt Lake Tribune. We have the
informed consent requirement of placing a public legal notice in
newspapers within the counties for three consecutive weeks where weather
modification shall take place by the private contracting corporations
that will be doing the aerial spraying.
And in the Public Notice we first viewed
above, we can see that this was for most or all counties in Utah, and so
this notice was likely circulated within all local newspaper in each
county for three weeks.
And not one person in Utah said no…
We can now see the full process of the
manufacturing of informed consent of the people of the State by the
government office who controls and regulates Weather Modification. We
can see that all of these weather modification projects are absolutely
100% fully known and approved by government on behalf of the people and
their unwitting informed consent. And we now have an actual way to truly
withdraw our individual consent for this by referring to all of the
above CODES and statutes in our legal demand.
The Utah Division of Water Resources website can be found here: http://www.water.utah.gov/
–=–
What’s The Big Deal?
It’s harmless, Right?
–=–
Some people may be thinking that this is an alarmist presentation,
that making snow for skiers is a time-honored tradition and much more
important for the profit and enjoyment of tourism in the ski resorts
than any harm to the environment that it may cause. Perhaps that’s
because silver and mineral compounds are not even slightly understood by
the people who find skiing more important than health.What’s The Big Deal?
It’s harmless, Right?
–=–
“Silver Iodide”, as mentioned in the Public Notice of Intent above, is listed as the main compound to be used for most of Utah’s non-experimental (non-research) weather modification. So what is silver iodide and what effects will it have on the environment?
While the precious metal called Silver (Ag) has many wonderful traits and applications in human and corporate life, this does not in any way mean that it is harmless when sprayed over the environment. Silver has long been known to be an antiseptic, and silver coins used to be used as for water purification by simply dropping a 90% silver coin into a barrel of water, creating a non-septic drinkable water and killing parasites and other water-born pathogens. Silver is used today in many modern medical uses from silver lined bandages and ointments that prevent infection and bacterial growth to silver-lined socks to control foot odor (by preventing fungus’s, bacteria, etc.). And of course many people make their own colloidal silver water for personal consumption and health, again as an anti-septic within the body. Silver, gold, and like metals in their true elemental form are even known to help with sleep issues like insomnia.
But while these fungus and bacterial killing effects of silver are wonderful life-saving miracles in the fields of medicine and health, we must consider that these same effects will inevitably be felt in a negative way in nature if unnaturally introduced year after year.
What will silver do for instance, to the needed and necessary trillions of “bugs” and other microorganisms that inhabit the area being targeted with this silver iodide based weather modification? Nature, after all, is naturally septic for a reason. Thus, applying a known anti-septic such as that used in experimental weather modification and Geo-engineering is an irresponsible and potentially life-destroying practice – all in the name of ski resorts ability to sell lift tickets.
Imagine what would eventually happen to all life on this planet, even the microscopic life you can’t see, if the entire planet is being sprayed with antiseptics and other life-destroying metals on a continuing “experimental” campaign of Geo-engineering. Unfortunately, we are entering the age that we are able to see the destruction all around us.
In fact, we can read that the spread of bio-available forms of aluminum which do not appear in nature is so bad that Monsanto and other companies (along with government cooperation and ownership of some patents by government) has created aluminum stress-resistant seeds! While nature is shutting itself off from nature, these monster corporations are profiting from a monopoly on the only Genetically modified lifeforms that can live in such a modified environment.
Farmwars.com reports:
The patent for aluminum resistance mentioned in What in the World are They Spraying? turns out to be owned by the USDA and Brazil’s agricultural department, not Monsanto directly… and evidently, made for acidic soil and will not be effective in an alkaline soil caused
by chemtrailing. Therefore, it appears that this particular patent most
likely is targeted for Africa, which seems to be a major biotech
interest…
Monsanto DOES own patents that appear to
mitigate the effects of Geo-engineering, that can be applied to a whole
host of fruits, trees, grains and veggies. A quick patent search brings
up 3,981 hits for Monsanto and Stress Tolerance. Mendel Biotechnology is
partners with Monsanto in several of these patents. This is taken from
one of the joint patents:
“The claimed invention, in the field of
functional genomics and the characterization of plant genes for the
improvement of plants, was made by or on behalf of Mendel Biotechnology,
Inc. and Monsanto Corporation as a result of activities undertaken
within the scope of a joint research agreement in effect on or before
the date the claimed invention was made.”
Here is a patent titled “Stress tolerant plants and methods thereof,” that is owned by Monsanto, and seems to address all forms of abiotic stress that weather manipulation and chemtrails can cause:
“FIELD OF THE INVENTION
Described herein are inventions in the
field of plant molecular biology and plant genetic engineering. In
particular, DNA constructs encoding a polypeptide and transgenic plants
containing the DNA constructs are provided. The transgenic plants are characterized by improved stress tolerance.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
One of the goals of plant genetic
engineering is to produce plants with agronomically, horticulturally or
economically important characteristics or traits. Traits of particular
interest include high yield, improved quality and yield stability. The
yield from a plant is greatly influenced by external environmental
factors including water availability and heat, of which tolerance of
extremes is in turn influenced by internal developmental factors.
Enhancement of plant yield may be achieved by genetically modifying the
plant to be tolerant to yield losses due to stressful environmental
conditions, such as heat and drought stress.
Seed and fruit production are both limited
inherently due to abiotic stress. Soybean ( Glycine max ), for
instance, is a crop species that suffers from loss of seed germination
during storage and fails to germinate when soil temperatures are cool
(Zhang et al., Plant Soil 188: (1997)). This is also true in corn and
other plants of agronomic importance. Improvement of abiotic
stress tolerance in plants would be an agronomic advantage to growers
allowing enhanced growth and/or germination in cold, drought, flood,
heat, UV stress, ozone increases, acid rain, pollution, salt stress,
heavy metals, mineralized soils, and other abiotic stresses.”
Here are the plants that this “invention” intends to cover:
The method of claim 7, wherein said crop
plant is selected from the group consisting of corn, soybean, wheat,
cotton, rice and rapeseed/canola.
Further on down, we find that a whole host of other plants are under the microscope and used for the process as well:
The transgenic plant is selected from the
group consisting of: Acacia , alfalfa, aneth, apple, apricot, artichoke,
arugula, asparagus, avocado, banana, barley, beans, beet, blackberry,
blueberry, broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage, canola, cantaloupe,
carrot, cassaya, cauliflower, celery, cherry, cilantro, citrus,
clementines, coffee, corn, cotton, cucumber, Douglas fir, eggplant,
endive, escarole, eucalyptus, fennel, figs, forest tree, gourd, grape,
grapefruit, honey dew, jicama, kiwifruit, lettuce, leeks, lemon, lime,
loblolly pine, mango, melon, millet, mushroom, nut, oat, okra, onion,
orange, papaya, parsley, pea, peach, peanut, pear, pepper, persimmon,
pine, pineapple, plantain, plum, pomegranate, poplar, potato, pumpkin,
quince, radiata pine, radicchio, radish, raspberry, rice, rye, sorghum,
southern pine, soybean, spinach, squash, strawberry, sugarbeet,
sugarcane, sunflower, sweet potato, sweetgum, tangerine, tea, tobacco,
tomato, turf, a vine, watermelon, wheat, yams, and zucchini.”
(Article Source: http://farmwars.info/?p=7760)
But again, what is the most important aspect of this entire issue?
Government issues the patents!!! Government is offering protection to these corporations, and is a heavy controlling investor into these mega-corporations that receives dividends and patent rights itself for these inventions. And so we the people must not simply trust that government will have a change of heart and suddenly protect the people from its investment held corporations. The conflict of interest here is so great as to be off the scale of corruption.
And so the people must once again stop playing the fools they have been trained to be, and we must each individually take legal action against government. And without even realizing it, the people have the highest power of the land and the only tool aside from all out violent revolt to stop this organized crime and killing of the natural planet – the withdrawal of their legal consent. For a truly informed public would never allow this to happen. It is time to stop talking and to start taking action in the only way that matters.
Please, keep reading…
Perhaps you are not familiar with the difference between organic minerals and inorganic mineral compounds?
It is important to note that the natural weather cycles of rainfall occur precisely due to the distillation (evaporation) process. Very much like the artificial bottled water distillation process for drinking, in nature the water is sucked into the atmosphere clean in its pure form of H2O – leaving the trace minerals behind – then falling back to the Earth again while collecting and delivering trace minerals as the naturally pure water goes back into the ground to nurture life. This is natures supplement delivery system that plants rely upon for their very life.
But when this natural distillation process is altered by adding mineral compounds to the process such as silver iodide, that water is no longer pure. Instead, it is falling to Earth in an altered (inorganic) form. And since minerals are magnetically attracted to each other (becoming compounds of two or more minerals together – like the calcium and carbon that bind to create inorganic calcium carbonate that does not dissolve in water, otherwise known as chalk that is found in most misleading “supplements”) many of these trace minerals are also altered as they bind together.
The root system of a plant or tree can only absorb the smallest of pure trace minerals into their root systems, in particles so small as to be angstrom-sized (1 million times smaller than in a typical supplement pill). The human body works in quite the same way, where small organic minerals (not compounds) can enter and pass through the blood-brain barrier (compounds like calcium carbonate cannot do this).
Since silver iodide is not a natural mineral substance generally found in the soil, not to mention the mass amounts of bio-available aluminum, boron, and other compounds used in experimental Geo-engineering, the root system of these living systems of plants and trees defend themselves by closing off their own absorption capability to any naturally occurring organic and inorganic nutrient minerals in the soil. In short, the trees and plant-life are literally killing themselves to protect themselves from these toxic metals being sprayed in our skies by going on a hunger strike.
We must understand that plants absorb minerals broken down by the humic and fulvic acids in the soils, dissolving the dualistic nature of compounds into these organic minerals at a size small enough to break the absorption barrier of those root systems. A compound is two or more bound minerals, and is generally in an inorganic form. Silver iodide is an inorganic compound not usable by living organisms, and is not able to be broken down naturally.
So let’s uncover what “silver iodide” as used to create nucleation actually is:
Silver iodide is prepared by reaction of
an iodide solution (e.g. potassium iodide) with a solution of silver
ions (e.g. silver nitrate). A yellowish solid quickly precipitates. The
solid is a mixture of the two principal phases. Dissolution of the AgI
in hydroiodic acid, followed by dilution with water precipitates β-AgI.
Alternatively, dissolution of AgI in a solution of concentrated silver
nitrate followed by dilution affords α-AgI. If the preparation is not
conducted in the absence of sunlight, the solid darkens rapidly, the
light causing the reduction of ionic silver to metallic. The
photo-sensitivity varies with sample purity.
Cloud seeding
The crystalline structure of β-AgI is
similar to that of ice, allowing it to induce freezing by the process
known as heterogeneous nucleation. Approximately 50,000 kg/year are used
for cloud seeding annually, each seeding experiment consuming
10-50 grams.
An azeotrope is a mixture of two or more liquids in such a way that its components cannot be altered by simple distillation. This happens because, when an azeotrope is boiled, the vapor it produces has proportionate constituents as the original mixture.
Because their composition is unchanged by distillation, azeotropes are also called constant boiling mixtures. The word azeotrope
is derived from the Greek words ζέειν (boil) and τρόπος (state)
combined with the prefix α- (no) to give the overall meaning, “no change
on boiling”.
Please listen to this important and dyer interview with Dane Wigington (geoengineeringwatch.org) here for more on the consequences in saturating the biosphere with these types of man-made compounds, and how nucleation by cloud seeding has created total disaster in our natural climate systems (28 minutes: highly recommended)
GeoEngineeringWatch website: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
And to show how helplessly ignorant most groups are of what i am putting forward here today, here is the “What You Can Do” list that the Geo-engineering Watch website gives – with not one legal remedy or concept mentioned.
What You Can Do: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/what-you-can-do/
Please don’t take this as any form of disrespect in any way, for these folks have done as much or more than anyone to inform the public of this problem and its intricate web of implementation. This is only to point out the purposeful obfuscation by media, education, and government as to the true power of the people and the necessity of their consent. In fact, this is the group I hope most of all to pick this project up and run with it…
And now, after many decades of spraying the skies, whole forest systems that once cleaned the air of carbons are instead dying and releasing carbons into the air. They are starving themselves to protect themselves.
Now, is it really your attitude that the sport of skiing is really so important that we should even consider making artificial snow for that purpose using silver iodide? And is the control of the weather by our military psychopaths really so important that extinction level events in all species and plant-life are worth the price of that control?
I don’t think so.
If you feel the same, let’s you and I do something about it…
–=–
Government Defines Public Body, Notice, Hearing
–=–
Here is what Utah State government defines within its CODES for the people to understand what the word “public” means:Government Defines Public Body, Notice, Hearing
–=–
A Public Body is any administrative, advisory, executive, or legislative body of the state or its political subdivisions that: is created by the Utah Constitution, statute, rule, ordinance, or resolution; consists of two or more persons; expends, disburses, or is supported in whole or in part by tax revenue; and is vested with the authority to make decisions regarding the public’s business.
A Public Notice is a way of informing the general public of government or government-related activities which may concern their local area, municipality, county, or state.
A Public Meeting is a forum that is reasonably structured and formal in nature, and open to the general public.
A Public Hearing is a portion of a meeting intended to receive input from the general public. A public hearing may be required by ordinance or statute. The time, place and subject of the hearing must be posted as required by an ordinance or statute.
A Legal Notice is a communication required to be made public by a state statute or state agency rule; or a notice required for judicial proceedings or by judicial decision. Legal notice does not include a public notice published by a public body in accordance with the provisions of Sections 52-4-202 and 63F-1-701.
“Utah’s public bodies are required to post
notices of open meetings and other public notices on the Public Notice
Website. The statutes establishing this website are in Utah Code
63F-1-701, but there are many mandates dictating the information and
timing of public notices.”
(Source: http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html)
So what do we need to do?
The first step of this plan is of course to monitor your local government websites and newspapers to ensure that these types of notices do not go unchallenged. For this I would suggest setting up a watchdog group in each county or States that continuously searches for and shares with others these notices of intent. They can be for anything from weather modification to municipal bonds. In this way the people can have the opportunity to express and demand notice of their non-consent to the decisions made by appointed and elected officials. They are not above the law, and the law requires informed consent!!!
So this is the first step: finding the legal notices that fulfill the requirement of informed consent and challenging them individually through a written legal notice of non-consent.
–=–
A Short Lesson In Court Procedures
–=–
A Short Lesson In Court Procedures
–=–
I cannot stress enough here that this is a
project and effort that should not involve attorneys or any form of
representation whatsoever. If you’d like an attorney to help draft your
individual legal notice and demand, so be it. But under no circumstances
should you assign your rights over to another artificial person (a
representative). You already have done this wtih government (which is
mostly attorneys) and look where it has got us! The services of an
attorney should be nipped in the butt the second your official letter is
drafted and no later. You are your own advocate. Period!
And so this chore will require time and
effort for each individual person who wishes to participate. In other
words, it will require you to actually get up off of your ass and do
something about what’s so wrong with the world, instead of just talking
about it or watching another video about it. And perhaps this fact is
what is so unheard of and revolutionary about this process –
self-empowerment like you have never known it before. Waking up the
sleeping giant within each of us.
Unfortunately this is the point were
everything becomes blurry for most of us, because in the past we always
allow attorneys to go to court on our behalf. So we have never learned
the legal system or the laws that bind it. We can use it as a tool for
our own advantage, if we just know how to find the right avenue.
The best part about this all is that you will likely never have to step in front of a judge or in a courtroom at all – ever.
This should very much put your mind at ease…
You see, all of what this plan involves can
be done either through the U.S. Mail system or by speaking with the
Court Clerk outside of the courtroom and without addressing a judge. In
fact, let me say right now that you should never enter into a courtroom
for any part of this effort unless I say so in the future, and this will
likely never happen.
But in order for our collective but
individual efforts to have merit and legal credibility, we must
understand the full process of how to deliver these letters, and which
specific government officials (employees) to talk to and force them to
accept our letters of non-consent.
The difference between a demand and a plea
is very important. Simply stated, while a plea is asking permission from
government, a demand is not a choice. It’s a DEMAND! We are not asking
permission from government, we are legally demanding an action.
With that said, we must not fall into the trap of entering into any form of administrative
court, which is what we are used to doing through no fault of our own
but the ignorance of the law. The administrative court of equity is
where attorneys feed on unwary innocents. And we must understand that
judges are nothing more than attorneys in black robes – administrative
officers. So we want to avoid the de facto administrative courts all together.
Instead, we must always utilize what is
called the “Court of Record”, which is the highest court in the land. It
is called the Court of RECORD
because this court is what creates a public record. The court itself
does not have a choice in the matter, and your submission of demand of
non-consent must be accepted and placed into the public record. This is
oh- so important to our cause, for without an official public record of
your individual non-consent to having biological agents sprayed upon
you, there is nothing that can later be used to prove that the people
voiced their non-consent in the public record. You see, this step must
be done properly in the proper court, or this effort will ultimately be
left up to governments administration to decide for you. The Court of
Record is so important and so high, that it even overshadows the Supreme
Court itself. For the Supreme Court can only issue what is called
“opinions’ on legal matters. So we would wish to avoid this issue for
our own purposes from entering into this administrative Supreme Court
and instead want it to be left up to a jury of our peers in a court of
law of the people – a grand jury.
Of these two courts, there is a huge and
unavoidable difference. Thus, we must enter our legal demand of
non-consent within and only within the Court of Record.
But how do we do this so as to guarantee our letter will be entered into the proper court for public record?
Ah, this brings us to your simple act of
your participation – the only real effort you must make on behalf of
yourself and your family to stop Geo-engineering for good.
I would recommend that you personally hand-deliver your letter of non-consent to what is called the “COURT CLERK“.
I cannot stress the importance of verifying this title with the officer of the court that you speak to at the court house.
What is the Court Clerk?
Only the most important officer of the judicial system!
With the highest rate of required bonded
insurance, the Court Clerk has the power to not only enter your demand
as public record, but may also issue a “default judgement” on your
behalf for non-response by the other party. The other party, in this
case, is the government.
The court will have many lower “Clerks of
the Court” running around, but these amount to nothing more than
secretaries for the judges themselves. These are administrative clerks
in the administrative court – where attorneys rule.
We only want the “Court Clerk”, and there will likely be only one in the entire courthouse.
This is the person we must demand to speak
to and verify their title. And then we must receive a time-stamp and
official “seal” of the court proving it was entered into the proper
Court of Record. Nothing else will do, and no other clerk of that court
can help you. Again, you are not asking permission, you are demanding
justice.
Once this letter of non-consent is filed and
stamped as public record, it can now be sent out to the proper
government and corporation offices that are responsible for
Geo-engineering.
Within the letter itself, we would place a
certain amount of business days that the defendant would be allowed to
utilize before a response is required by law. If that office does not
respond by that specified time, then you will go back into the court
house and demand (not ask) that a default judgement be assigned to your
case. And once this is again placed into the public record of the court,
that a default judgement was indeed assigned, we now have the tool to
take the government to court for acting against the will of the
“people”. Remember… silence is consent to contract. If government does
not respond, it now has an obligation to fulfill the contract, which
means it must cease and desist weather modification until the subject is
addressed publicly.
Now imagine if 10′s of thousands of
individual “people” did the same thing, creating public records of
government’s blatant and illegal disregard of the people’s non-consent,
acting on the record without the consent of all people they represent.
Now imagine millions from all over the country. Without informed consent
the only alternative is to operate without informed consent – which as
we have read is absolutely unlawful.
If government does respond, while it may
beat around the bush for a while, we must remain persistent and respond
to each and every response that comes back to us individually, until the
record is set. But in both of these scenarios, the legal notice that
you and many others do not consent can not be summarily dismissed
because it is officially part of the public record.
The most important aspect here is the
creation of the public record in the proper court forum that gives
government notice of your non-consent. Without this, it will continue to
operate as is while assuming your voluntary informed consent. With the
record in place, the government can only continue to operate under fraud
and contempt of the people, showing its true colors and leaving it open
to legal remedy by the people so condemned.
This is as far as I will go with the process
itself, as this will take much more effort and organization to get the
process going and done correctly. My objective here is only to put
forward this plan so that others may be moved to implement it. And for
this, I need each and every one of that have read this far to pass this
on to your friends and to groups who are actually organized enough to
pull a plan of this magnitude together. For this, we need as many
individuals with as much word of mouth as possible. But again, in the
end, we must step out of this comfort zone of social media and hearsay
to actually take the action needed.
–=–
What To Do Now
–=–
What To Do Now
–=–
To be honest, I do not kid myself or have
any disillusion that this writing will spark some glorious revolution of
legal paperwork that floods the court system and government officers to
the point that they will end this madness of altering our environment.
Perhaps the notion that was put forward by the twisted mind of Aldus
Huxley describes the reality of our collective disposition best when he
stated that we will grow to love our servitude to this system
of government, with the help of anti-depressants and other mind altering
pharmaceuticals for which he simply referred to as Soma. Inaction seems to be the new action!
But for the possibilities related to this
idea I have something that seems rare these days for someone like me…
hope. I dare to hope in these hopeless times that the people finally
stand up for themselves and revoke their consent to Geo-engineering and
to government tyranny. For if this can be done, imagine what else the
government does with our implied consent that can be stopped cold. War,
murder, torture, the patenting and cloning of life, rendition and
incarceration of innocent men and women for profit… the list goes on and
on.
But I will hold out with my small sliver of
hope that you will not just brush this idea aside, and instead share it
and make it happen.
I’ve provided the CODES and statutes for all
levels of governance of this destructive practice, and offered the only
real solution that is actually available to such a people in such utter
servitude to a government gone wild. Think about that for a minute…
this is literally and legally the only solution available to us. That’s
really heavy, and the moral and ethical responsibility of this is now on
your soul, heavy as can be. That is, since you’ve actually read this
far and now know what you must do.
And so for the immediate future, I can only
ask you to help me by passing this information on to the proper
organizations and people who might actually wish to join me in some form
of tribunal that can organize the legal writing of these notices of
non-consent for all people to uniformly utilize so that we can sooner
than later end this chemical destruction of our home.
I fully accept and affirm that the above
information may have errors or misconceptions on my own behalf, and
would be very open to debate on this possibility. Please leave a comment
below if you find fallacy or flaw with any of this. This is how it will
be eventually perfected and I thank you. Trolls may go back to the hole
they crawled from, and points or attacks without fact will be treated
as troll-like behavior. Take the responsibility of fulfilling the burden
of proof of your argument, as I have endeavored to do here.
You may email me at:
TemporaryInsanity4848@yahoo.com
But in truth, what I really need is someone
out there to take the reigns of this project, a manager/producer of
sorts, passionate enough to organize a few good men and women to head
it, and then I will do my best to be part of that group along with my
own team of trusted friends. This needs to be promoted by “chemtrail”
websites especially, so that those who subscribe to such sites may
further the plan.
Until then, I’m not financially or
physically able to do this myself. And so I ask you to make this happen –
to find the one person out there that has what it takes to organize
such an undertaking without profit or ulterior motives, and without
creating a need to join an organization or take representation. And
perhaps this may be the most difficult part of the whole plan. The rest
is easy, if the people choose to participate.
Until then, I thank you for taking the time to read to this point, and will continue to hope for brighter days (pun intended).
ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE:
http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/03/16/the-only-way-we-can-stop-geoengineering/
